12.07.2013 Views

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

198 | denis beckett<br />

attached a diverse range of cuttings referring to Inkatha as<br />

“thugs” or worse. Some quoted famous wrong libel judgments<br />

– Liberace getting damages for “homosexual”, before he came<br />

out of the closet; Lloyd George for “adultery”, later proven.<br />

None of this made me the “winner” but it did tell me that many<br />

people were as bamboozled as I was.<br />

also, I had echoes of some feedback that went to Buthelezi,<br />

including a backer dropping him and an ally leaving him. I<br />

don’t believe his “victory” brought him joy. a while later, when<br />

he broke down at a much-publicised prayer meeting and wept<br />

about his conscience, I was much urged, not always tongue-incheek,<br />

to assure him that if returning my money would ease his<br />

conscience he should feel free. That was an idea I did not take up.<br />

But I did believe there was an error in play and I drafted a long<br />

earnest letter to the chief Justice to say so.<br />

I knew this was an unorthodox route. I’d taken some of those<br />

before, but this time, at the last minute, doubts arose. I went to<br />

see my former boss Judge Nick Nicholas.<br />

Nick had given me lots of firm counsel, mainly twenty years<br />

ago when I drafted reviews for him. This time he surpassed<br />

himself. He asked why the decision was wrong. I said: obvious,<br />

look at any newspaper. He asked why two courts would reach<br />

a wrong decision. I said: obvious, Buthelezi is the white<br />

establishment’s favourite Black.<br />

Half a hour later, in relief, I tore up my letter and dropped<br />

the scraps in a bin at the bottom of Nick’s hill.<br />

Point one, paraphrased from Nick’s meticulous wording<br />

and consummate elocution, was that if I thought either of<br />

these courts would let a political sentiment intrude on their<br />

interpretation of the law, I was out of my tiny mind.<br />

Point two was that even if the chief Justice had a blinding<br />

revelation with fiery chariots, there was nought he could do.<br />

The highest court had spoken, and it could not unspeak.<br />

Point three was that whatever the newspapers may say, the<br />

judges judged on evidence, and the evidence we had led was of<br />

a couple of guys being slapped around a bit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!