12.07.2013 Views

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Radical Middle | 217<br />

Frontline was close to breathing its last. Here, now, in dying<br />

days, it shattered every response criterion it had known. If an<br />

article brought in five meaningful written responses, you’d<br />

feel privileged; ten you’d be astonished – the New Yorker,<br />

the Spectator, too, not just little Frontline. You didn’t get fanmail<br />

like in pop magazines. until the car story. There were<br />

about a hundred letters in first flush, perhaps the same again<br />

afterward …<br />

That would have been a nice sign-off. Poetically, I should<br />

have left it there. But I cocked it up. I did a “political” next<br />

edition where my politics went monty-python even by my own<br />

standards. There were grounds for it: I was anxious that the<br />

government would not stand on the white-preference stuff,<br />

pushing us back into more attrition. It looked as if they would.<br />

So I did an outlandish cover: “What if They Vote for De Klerk?”<br />

arguing a residue of rich democracy: If the democracy about to<br />

be introduced gave people lots of choice, not just one restatemy-identity<br />

vote, plenty of black people would vote for forces<br />

that made drains run and taps flow.<br />

actually, the argument was/is sane enough if you read it<br />

properly, but who was going to do that? That cover on its own<br />

simply screamed: craziness.<br />

I think also that cover was influenced by meeting Gerrit<br />

Viljoen, the Minister of constitutional Development.<br />

To him, I put my case that “one man one vote” was<br />

the starting-point. He said I was out of order; I was asking<br />

the government to give in. “Give in” was a big phrase; the<br />

unthinkable alternative to “compromise”. I argued that fullscale<br />

democracy was not giving in; when you’d gone beyond<br />

“giving in” you got the ingredients for stability.<br />

This was at a discussion group called Synthesis, at the house<br />

of Kate and Neil Jowell in Oranjezicht. Viljoen dumped on me<br />

a few more times, but muted. Some of my fellow members<br />

muttered “stick to the real world” and other familiar phrases.<br />

as Viljoen was about to leave he made his way over to me, to<br />

the surprise of some of the mutterers, and said, very openly:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!