Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
164 | denis beckett<br />
Karl stuffed up half the world for most of a century. How?<br />
By being opaque and learned. You had to read a sentence five<br />
times so you took it seriously. Way to go.<br />
So I re-started. I got opaque and learned, bringing in history<br />
and psychology and sociology and long words like in real<br />
textbooks. fallacy had been criticised for failing to identify an<br />
academic pedigree. This failure was not accidental, there being<br />
no pedigree whether academic or other, but for Book Three the<br />
plan was that if people want a pedigree, a pedigree they shall<br />
have. I’d still say what I wanted but I’d back it up with “ibids”<br />
and “op cits” and classy names from Hannah arendt to emile<br />
Zola. There’d be no asides, no anecdotes, no frivolous bits; solid<br />
theory, grave and earnest. Karl had constructed a palatial theory<br />
on a dud foundation. I had the right foundation so I needed but<br />
a bungalow theory. It just had to sound theoretical.<br />
also, I had to dose up the guarantee against tyranny. To<br />
the Nats – and Progs, Black consciousniks, Inkathas, Pac s,<br />
everyone outside the juggernaut called aNc – my reasoning fell<br />
flat against one single line: but-they’ll-tear-up-the-constitution.<br />
I’d thought I’d allayed that – right from ‘84, in fact; that had<br />
been kick-off point. If power counted at every tier, the social<br />
fabric was thickly stitched. If power-wielders in every tier<br />
answered to their voters, the constitution was untearable – not<br />
optionally untearable, or difficult to tear; granite untearable.<br />
Strictly, the constitution itself would not be very important.<br />
Its written checks and balances would be overtaken by the<br />
organic check-and-balance of thousands of majority wills. The<br />
interaction of wills would be the guarantor of constitutionalism.<br />
One day, that would be as self-evident as belt-buckles or<br />
automatic kettles. Schoolchildren would laugh on learning that<br />
once upon a time order had depended on clauses composed by<br />
bygone dignitaries. a clause to protect minority rights would as<br />
inconceivable as a clause to protect the law of gravity. One day,<br />
natural process would do the job. “Minority rights” would cease<br />
to be an endangered species; it would become an archaic term.<br />
But “one day” was not here yet. People had to see clause LXV (7)