Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Radical Middle | 97<br />
long words as every editor and commentator ground out one<br />
or other answer. To one editor and commentator, since a “Yes”<br />
was out of the question and a “No” was unthinkable, it was<br />
best to duck.<br />
In the September edition, I ducked.<br />
and I got a howl of protest.<br />
This was genuinely instructive. I’d been sounding opinions<br />
all along, occasionally hearing that someone had read them but<br />
never suspecting that anyone would miss them. But yep, people<br />
were missing this opinion. Wow! I felt obliged. I wrestled. Others<br />
wrestled. Pieter le roux, prof of economics at the university of<br />
the Western cape; rykie van reenen, recently retired as Rapport’s<br />
super-enlightened genius columnist; Hazel Moolman, deputy<br />
director of the Institute of race relations. We discussed.<br />
Others, too. everyone said the question was a “Have you<br />
stopped beating your wife?” You were damned by a Yes and<br />
damned by a No. Of course, if someone actually asked you that<br />
question you wouldn’t say either Yes or No. You’d say, “I have<br />
never beaten my wife.” (Or klap the questioner.)<br />
What a pity the referendum did not let us choose our own<br />
way of answering. Hmm. Didn’t it? It told you to put your X<br />
against the Yes or your X against the No, But it didn’t stop you<br />
putting a big X across both. This act would be counted and<br />
recorded, as a “spoilt vote”.<br />
Normally the spoilt vote was a meaningless half-percent<br />
thing comprised of people who changed their minds in midstream<br />
or wrote abuse. But if a meaning was allocated to that<br />
space, anything more than a percent or so would constitute an<br />
expression. In some countries the “spoilt vote” was known to<br />
take on meanings that the legislature did not intend. In australia<br />
it was called “voting informal”, and had won a referendum – on<br />
forestry in Tasmania.<br />
The October Frontline displayed a two-page article called<br />
“Sense and conscience in the Third Option”, claiming route<br />
3 for the cause of “it’s a try but not good enough”. That was a<br />
large claim and a twopenny magazine was not the ideal source