12.07.2013 Views

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Radical Middle | 97<br />

long words as every editor and commentator ground out one<br />

or other answer. To one editor and commentator, since a “Yes”<br />

was out of the question and a “No” was unthinkable, it was<br />

best to duck.<br />

In the September edition, I ducked.<br />

and I got a howl of protest.<br />

This was genuinely instructive. I’d been sounding opinions<br />

all along, occasionally hearing that someone had read them but<br />

never suspecting that anyone would miss them. But yep, people<br />

were missing this opinion. Wow! I felt obliged. I wrestled. Others<br />

wrestled. Pieter le roux, prof of economics at the university of<br />

the Western cape; rykie van reenen, recently retired as Rapport’s<br />

super-enlightened genius columnist; Hazel Moolman, deputy<br />

director of the Institute of race relations. We discussed.<br />

Others, too. everyone said the question was a “Have you<br />

stopped beating your wife?” You were damned by a Yes and<br />

damned by a No. Of course, if someone actually asked you that<br />

question you wouldn’t say either Yes or No. You’d say, “I have<br />

never beaten my wife.” (Or klap the questioner.)<br />

What a pity the referendum did not let us choose our own<br />

way of answering. Hmm. Didn’t it? It told you to put your X<br />

against the Yes or your X against the No, But it didn’t stop you<br />

putting a big X across both. This act would be counted and<br />

recorded, as a “spoilt vote”.<br />

Normally the spoilt vote was a meaningless half-percent<br />

thing comprised of people who changed their minds in midstream<br />

or wrote abuse. But if a meaning was allocated to that<br />

space, anything more than a percent or so would constitute an<br />

expression. In some countries the “spoilt vote” was known to<br />

take on meanings that the legislature did not intend. In australia<br />

it was called “voting informal”, and had won a referendum – on<br />

forestry in Tasmania.<br />

The October Frontline displayed a two-page article called<br />

“Sense and conscience in the Third Option”, claiming route<br />

3 for the cause of “it’s a try but not good enough”. That was a<br />

large claim and a twopenny magazine was not the ideal source

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!