12.07.2013 Views

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Radical Middle | 103<br />

out 80,000 words and two more to delete 70,000 of them. That<br />

was mistake Number One. Heavyweight arguments must come<br />

in heavyweight packaging. People say they want brevity and<br />

accessibility, but when they get brevity and accessibility they<br />

call it frivolity.<br />

I thought the franchise argument would spark debate.<br />

Months previously I had sparked debate with a shorter and<br />

easier article – the spoilt papers – and I assumed there was<br />

some correlation between effort of input and effect of output.<br />

Mistake Number Two.<br />

There was a trickle of replies. Vause raw, the leader of the New<br />

republic Party, sent one. Willie Breytenbach of the Department<br />

of constitutional Planning sent another. I ran about ten in the<br />

end, and would have run more but they all said the same thing:<br />

Nice to be idealistic, what about the real world?<br />

Well, what about it? The “real world” was in a straitjacket,<br />

moving in to the turmoil of ‘85. I acquired the habit of relating<br />

the conflicts we were seeing to the thought of how the<br />

accountable society I had in mind would handle them. The<br />

answer was always: with less difficulty. chain the politicos to<br />

the people who elected them, and you’d get a dull and stable<br />

society.<br />

Impotence was the thing: impotence, present, perceived,<br />

or prospective. Why were people throwing stones? To protest<br />

their impotence under white rule. Why were the babas of<br />

the townships terrified of stonethrowers? Because they were<br />

impotent. Why were the liberals emigrating? They were already<br />

impotent and they saw black rule making them more impotent.<br />

Why were the police hammering protesters? Because black rule<br />

would plunge them into impotence.<br />

What I was getting at was: let the majority really rule and<br />

you’re going to have all kinds of people making most of their<br />

own decisions over the things that bother them most. Majority<br />

rule didn’t need to mean “black rule” and it didn’t need to<br />

mean a mess. I was sure that once the nation had a moment<br />

to wrap its mind around an unfamiliar proposition, it would

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!