Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Radical Middle | 103<br />
out 80,000 words and two more to delete 70,000 of them. That<br />
was mistake Number One. Heavyweight arguments must come<br />
in heavyweight packaging. People say they want brevity and<br />
accessibility, but when they get brevity and accessibility they<br />
call it frivolity.<br />
I thought the franchise argument would spark debate.<br />
Months previously I had sparked debate with a shorter and<br />
easier article – the spoilt papers – and I assumed there was<br />
some correlation between effort of input and effect of output.<br />
Mistake Number Two.<br />
There was a trickle of replies. Vause raw, the leader of the New<br />
republic Party, sent one. Willie Breytenbach of the Department<br />
of constitutional Planning sent another. I ran about ten in the<br />
end, and would have run more but they all said the same thing:<br />
Nice to be idealistic, what about the real world?<br />
Well, what about it? The “real world” was in a straitjacket,<br />
moving in to the turmoil of ‘85. I acquired the habit of relating<br />
the conflicts we were seeing to the thought of how the<br />
accountable society I had in mind would handle them. The<br />
answer was always: with less difficulty. chain the politicos to<br />
the people who elected them, and you’d get a dull and stable<br />
society.<br />
Impotence was the thing: impotence, present, perceived,<br />
or prospective. Why were people throwing stones? To protest<br />
their impotence under white rule. Why were the babas of<br />
the townships terrified of stonethrowers? Because they were<br />
impotent. Why were the liberals emigrating? They were already<br />
impotent and they saw black rule making them more impotent.<br />
Why were the police hammering protesters? Because black rule<br />
would plunge them into impotence.<br />
What I was getting at was: let the majority really rule and<br />
you’re going to have all kinds of people making most of their<br />
own decisions over the things that bother them most. Majority<br />
rule didn’t need to mean “black rule” and it didn’t need to<br />
mean a mess. I was sure that once the nation had a moment<br />
to wrap its mind around an unfamiliar proposition, it would