14.07.2013 Views

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Processing <strong>Modflow</strong> 101<br />

MODFLOW < Solvers<br />

To calculate heads in each cell in the finite-difference grid, MODFLOW prepares one finite<br />

difference equation for each cell, expressing the relationship between the head at a node and the<br />

heads at each <strong>of</strong> the six adjacent nodes at the end <strong>of</strong> a time step. Because each equation may<br />

involve up to seven unknown values <strong>of</strong> head, and because the set <strong>of</strong> unknown head values<br />

changes from one equation to the next through the grid, the equations for the entire grid must be<br />

solved simultaneously at each time step. The system <strong>of</strong> simultaneous finite difference linear<br />

equations can be expressed in matrix notation as<br />

A@x ' b<br />

(3.30)<br />

where A_ is a coefficient matrix assembled by MODFLOW using user-specified model data; b_<br />

is a vector <strong>of</strong> defined flows, terms associated with head-dependent boundary conditions and<br />

storage terms at each cell; x_ is a vector <strong>of</strong> hydraulic heads at each cell. One value <strong>of</strong> the hydraulic<br />

head for each cell is computed at the end <strong>of</strong> each time step. At present PMWIN supports four<br />

packages (solvers) for solving systems <strong>of</strong> simultaneous linear equations:<br />

- the Direct Solution (DE45) package,<br />

- the Preconditioned Conjugate-Gradient 2 (PCG2) package,<br />

- the Strongly Implicit Procedure (SIP) package, and<br />

- the Slice-Successive Overrelaxation(SSOR) package.<br />

Input parameters <strong>of</strong> these solution methods are discussed below. See McDonald and Harbaugh<br />

(1988), Hill (1990a) and Harbaugh (1995) for detailed mathematical background and numerical<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> these solvers. Various comparisons between the solution methods can be<br />

found in Trescott (1977), Behie and Forsyth (1983), Scandrett (1989) and Hill (1990b). Hill<br />

indicates that the greatest differences in solver efficiency on scalar computers occur for three-<br />

dimensional, non-linear problems. For these types <strong>of</strong> problems, it may be well worth the time and<br />

effort to try more than one solver. If your model does not have a large number <strong>of</strong> active cells, you<br />

may try to use the direct solver (DE45). Otherwise, SIP generally is a good alternative to<br />

consider.Note that the MODFLOW version “MODFLOW + Density package from KIWA” does<br />

not support the Direction Solution package.<br />

3.6.1 MODFLOW

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!