14.07.2013 Views

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

288 Processing <strong>Modflow</strong><br />

6.6 Solute Transport<br />

6.6.1 One-Dimensional Dispersive Transport<br />

Folder: \pm5\examples\transport\transport1\<br />

Overview <strong>of</strong> the Problem<br />

This example demonstrate the use <strong>of</strong> numerical model and compares the numerical results with<br />

the analytical solution.<br />

A uniform flow with a hydraulic gradient <strong>of</strong> 2‰ exists in a sand column. The hydraulic<br />

conductivity <strong>of</strong> the sand column is 100 m/d. The effective porosity is 0.2. The longitudinal<br />

dispersivity is 1 m. A point source <strong>of</strong> 1 g is injected into the sand column.<br />

Your task is to construct an one-dimensional numerical model and calculate the<br />

breakthrough curve (concentration - time curve) at 20 m downstream <strong>of</strong> the point source.<br />

Calculate the breakthrough curve by using a longitudinal dispersivity <strong>of</strong> 4 m and compare these<br />

two curves. Will the peak arrival time <strong>of</strong> the concentration be changed if only the longitudinal<br />

dispersivity is changed?<br />

Modeling Approach and Simulation Results<br />

The numerical model <strong>of</strong> this example consists <strong>of</strong> one layer, one row and 51 columns. The<br />

thickness <strong>of</strong> the layer and the width <strong>of</strong> the row and column is 1 m. To obtain <strong>of</strong> hydraulic<br />

gradient <strong>of</strong> 2‰, the first cell and the last cell <strong>of</strong> the model are specifed as fixed-head cells with<br />

an initial hydraulic heads <strong>of</strong> 1.1 m and 1.0 m, respectively. The initial head <strong>of</strong> all other cells is<br />

1.0 m. A steady-state flow simulation is performed for a stress period length <strong>of</strong> 100 days.<br />

3<br />

The injected mass <strong>of</strong> 1 [g] is simulated by assigning an initial concentration <strong>of</strong> 5 [g/m ] to<br />

the cell [10, 1, 1]. Using the Boreholes and Observations dialog box, an observation borehole<br />

is set in the center <strong>of</strong> the cell [30, 1, 1]. The breakthrough curves for the dispersivity <strong>of</strong> 1 m and<br />

4 m are shown in Fig. 6.58. It is interesting to see that the concentration peak arrives earlier<br />

(with a lower concentration value) when the value <strong>of</strong> dispersivity is getting higher. At the first<br />

glance, this result is somewhat confusing because the center <strong>of</strong> the mass must travel with the<br />

same velocity, regardless <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> dispersivity. Because <strong>of</strong> a higher dispersivity, the front<br />

<strong>of</strong> the concentration plume travels faster and at the same time the intensity <strong>of</strong> the concentration<br />

drops down with a higher rate. This combination has caused this phenomenon.<br />

Analytical solutions for solute transport involving advection, dispersion and first-order<br />

6.6.1 One-Dimensional Dispersive Transport

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!