14.07.2013 Views

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248 Processing <strong>Modflow</strong><br />

cells, which is indicated by a negative value <strong>of</strong> THRESH. The wetting-iteration interval is 1 and<br />

THRESH is -0.5 foot, which means that the wetting threshold is 10 percent <strong>of</strong> the thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

a cell. In the second simulation, wetting <strong>of</strong> cells is based on comparison to heads both in<br />

horizontally adjacent and underlying cells (THRESH is positive). A wetting-iteration interval <strong>of</strong><br />

2 and a THRESH <strong>of</strong> 1.5 feet are used in order to prevent continued oscillation between wet and<br />

dry for some cells. Due to the steepness <strong>of</strong> the head gradient and the grid discretization, the head<br />

difference between adjacent horizontal cells is generally much larger than the head difference<br />

between adjacent vertical cells along the mound. For example, the cell at layer 4, row 3, column<br />

4 is supposed to be dry even though the head in the horizontally adjacent cell in column 3 is 1.4<br />

feet above the bottom <strong>of</strong> the layer. The vertical head difference between cells in this part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

model is much less; the difference between the head at the cell in layer 4, row 3, column 3 and<br />

the cell below is only 0.05 foot. Thus, the neighboring cell to the right is repeatedly and<br />

incorrectly converted to wet during the solution process if horizontal wetting is used with a<br />

wetting threshold <strong>of</strong> 0.5 foot. The larger wetting threshold and wetting-iteration interval used in<br />

the second simulation allow convergence to occur, but only after many iterations. In this<br />

simulation, head in adjacent vertical cells is the best indicator <strong>of</strong> when a dry cell should become<br />

wet.<br />

The formation <strong>of</strong> the groundwater mound over time can be obtained with a transient<br />

simulation. The transient simulation is run for one stress period with a length <strong>of</strong> 500,000 days.<br />

The stress period is divided into 50 time steps with a time-step multiplier <strong>of</strong> 1.3. The first time<br />

step is 0.3 days, and the last time step is 115,385 days. The specific yield is 20 percent and the<br />

confined storage coefficient is 0.001. The PCG2 solver is used and cells are activated by<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> the wetting threshold to heads in underlying cells. The head change criterion for<br />

closure is 0.001 foot and the residual-change criterion is 10,000 cubic feet, the wetting threshold<br />

is 0.5 foot, the wetting factor is 0.5, and the wetting-iteration interval is 1. Fig. 6.23 shows<br />

simulated water-table heads along row 1 at several times during the transient simulation.<br />

Steady-state conditions were reached at the 44th time step <strong>of</strong> the transient simulation as<br />

indicated by storage flow terms being zero (see the simulation listing file OUTPUT.DAT).<br />

6.2.4 Simulation <strong>of</strong> a Water-Table Mound resulting from Local Recharge

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!