14.07.2013 Views

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

User's guide of Proceessing Modflow 5.0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Processing <strong>Modflow</strong> 299<br />

6.7.2 An Example <strong>of</strong> Stochastic Modeling<br />

Folder: \pm5\examples\misc\misc2\<br />

Overview <strong>of</strong> the Problem<br />

Aquifer remediation measures are <strong>of</strong>ten designed by means <strong>of</strong> groundwater models. Model<br />

results are usually uncertain due to the imperfect knowledge <strong>of</strong> aquifer parameters. We are<br />

uncertain about whether the calibrated values <strong>of</strong> parameters represent the real aquifer system.<br />

We never know the actual small-scale distribution <strong>of</strong> some parameters, e.g. hydraulic<br />

conductivity or recharge. Thus, all groundwater models involve uncertainty. Stochastic models<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten employed to take into accoung uncertainty. In the stochastic modeling, the model<br />

parameters appear in the form <strong>of</strong> probability distributions <strong>of</strong> values, rather than as deterministic<br />

sets.<br />

We use the same aquifer described in chapter 2 to illustrate a conception <strong>of</strong> stochastic<br />

modeling. Using a two-dimensional approach to model the aquifer, we may ultilize the Field<br />

Generator to create lognormal correlated distributions <strong>of</strong> the horizontal hydraulic conductivity.<br />

The mean horizontal hydraulic conductivity <strong>of</strong> the aquifer is equal to (4 × 0.0001 + 6 ×<br />

-4<br />

0.0005) / 10 = 3.4 × 10 m/s. The standard deviation is assumed to be F = 0.5. The correlation<br />

length <strong>of</strong> 60m is used.<br />

In chapter 2, the pumping rate <strong>of</strong> the well was determined such that the contaminated area<br />

lies within the capture zone <strong>of</strong> the well. When realizations <strong>of</strong> the heterogeneous distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

hydraulic conductivity are introduced, it is obvious that the capture zone not always covers the<br />

entire contaminated area. The safety criterion for the measure can be defined as the percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> the covered area in relation to the entire contaminated area. The expected value <strong>of</strong> the safety<br />

criterion can be obtained from stochastic simulation.<br />

Modeling Approach and Simulation Results<br />

Using the Field Generator, lognormal distributions <strong>of</strong> the horizontal hydraulic conductivity are<br />

generated and stored in ASCII Matrix files. First, each generated realization is imported into the<br />

horizontal hydraulic conductivity matrix, then a flow simulation is performed. The capture zone<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pumping well, as well as pathlines, are computed with PMPATH. The resulting safety<br />

criterion is obtained by a Monte Carlo simulation. This implies that many realizations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

parameter field are produced and used in the flow simulation.<br />

Fig. 6.68 shows results <strong>of</strong> five realizations and the calculated mean safety criteria. Mean<br />

6.7.2 An Example <strong>of</strong> Stochastic Modeling

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!