18.07.2013 Views

The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles

The Acts of the Apostles

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

226 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES<br />

xix. 33, 34, lastly in <strong>the</strong> we-sections (xvi. 10) ei?<br />

^aKcSovlav . . . cvayyeXlcracTOai avrov^.<br />

In B (i. 24) a prayer is recorded, and it is left<br />

indefinite which <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company said it.<br />

In A (iv. 1) we read \a\ovvTcop avrutv, when St.<br />

Peter alone had spoken; (iv. 19) St. Peter and St.<br />

John are represented as speaking <strong>the</strong> words which<br />

follow, while it is clear that only one can have spoken<br />

<strong>the</strong>m ; lastly (iv. 24), <strong>the</strong> whole community is represented<br />

as saying <strong>the</strong> long prayer that follows. More-<br />

over, in <strong>the</strong> Antiochean source (xiv. 14 /. and xiv.<br />

22^), on two occasions words are placed in <strong>the</strong> mouths<br />

<strong>of</strong> St. Barnabas and St. Paul speaking toge<strong>the</strong>r, and<br />

in <strong>the</strong> passages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second part, which are certainly<br />

drawn from no written source, we read (xxi. 20)<br />

that St. James and <strong>the</strong> presbyters <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem speak<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> passage that follows that verse.<br />

Instances <strong>of</strong> abrupt change <strong>of</strong> grammatical sub-<br />

ject, such as might lead us to conjecture <strong>the</strong> presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> new sources that have been clumsily inserted into<br />

<strong>the</strong> narrative, are found in all parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> book.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> we-sections (xx. 12) <strong>the</strong> two words ^yayov<br />

and irapeKXyjOrjarav standing almost side by side have<br />

different subjects. In <strong>the</strong> passages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second part,<br />

which are certainly not drawn from any written<br />

source, abrupt change <strong>of</strong> subject is found in xvi. 28,<br />

29 ; xvii. 8, 9 ; xxiii. 32, 33 ; again in A in iv. 12<br />

iv. 24 ; V. 15 (where we should expect <strong>the</strong> <strong>Apostles</strong> in<br />

place <strong>of</strong> St. Peter) ; viii. 17 ; lastly, in <strong>the</strong> Antiochean<br />

source in vi. 6 ; vi. 12 [uncertain] ; vii. 4, 8, 10 ; xi.<br />

26^ XV. 31.<br />

It is altoge<strong>the</strong>r characteristic <strong>of</strong> St. Luke's style<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!