20.07.2013 Views

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Absolutely Not Total:<br />

Rejecting Insurance Company Arguments to Disclaim Coverage for<br />

<strong>Chinese</strong> <strong>Drywall</strong> Claims Based on Absolute” and “Total” Pollution Exclusions<br />

by Lorelie S. Masters 1<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

As shown by decisions by the high courts in California, New York and the District of<br />

Columbia, state appellate courts – the arbiters of state law – often limit “absolute” and “total”<br />

pollution exclusions to true “environmental pollution.” This trend accords with the historical<br />

representations that the insurance industry made in seeking the required regulatory approval of<br />

the exclusions from the state insurance commissions in the 50 states.<br />

At the time of first approval in the 1980s, the insurance industry represented that the<br />

“absolute pollution exclusion” (“APE”), though “overdrafted,” precluded coverage only for<br />

industrial or environmental pollution. Notwithstanding these representations to insurance<br />

regulators in the 1980s, insurance companies have used APEs and “total pollution exclusions”<br />

(“TPEs”) to reject coverage for products liability and other claims unrelated to environmental<br />

pollution. Although courts in the late 1980s and early 1990s often accepted the insurance<br />

industry’s rhetorical excess in naming these exclusions (“absolute” must mean “absolute”!), the<br />

insurance industry’s chronic abuse of these exclusions has increasingly led courts, particularly<br />

state courts which determine the law applicable to this issue, to limit the scope of these<br />

exclusions to true “environmental pollution.”<br />

As shown below, use of the APE, first promulgated in 1986 (the “1986 exclusion”), to<br />

preclude coverage for ordinary claims like products liability and premises-operations claims,<br />

1 Ms. Masters is a partner at Jenner & Block LLP, in Washington, D.C., where she advises and<br />

represents policyholders in insurance coverage matters. She is co-author of a treatise entitled<br />

Insurance Coverage <strong>Litigation</strong> and served for three years, from 2000-2003, as the Policyholder<br />

Chair of the Insurance Coverage <strong>Litigation</strong> Committee of the ABA’s Section of <strong>Litigation</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!