20.07.2013 Views

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Other states follow the “significant contacts” test. This is an even more diffuse test in<br />

which a court attempts to discern the state with the most significant interest in resolution of<br />

the coverage dispute. Factors that the courts consider in doing so include (i) the place where<br />

the insurance policy was executed, (ii) the place where the policy was negotiated, (iii) the<br />

place where the policy was to be performed, (iv) the location of the insured risk, and (v) the<br />

location of the parties. The location of the insured risk may not be the state in which the<br />

affected homes are located but rather the state in which the contractor performs most of its<br />

work.<br />

Among the states in which <strong>Chinese</strong> drywall has been discovered, states following the<br />

“place of contracting” test include Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia, South Carolina, and<br />

Virginia. States following the “significant contacts” test include Texas and Mississippi. A<br />

Texas statute, however, requires that Texas law be applied if the policyholder is a citizen or<br />

inhabitant of Texas (in the case of a corporation, meaning incorporated under the laws of<br />

Texas), and if the policy was issued by an insurer doing business in Texas in the course of<br />

the insurer’s business in Texas. A North Carolina statute requires that North Carolina courts<br />

apply North Carolina law to all insurance policies made within the state, applied for in the<br />

state, or that cover property in the state. The choice of law rule in Florida is unsettled, and<br />

the issue is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court. See USF&G v. Liberty<br />

Surplus Ins. Corp., 550 F.3d 1031, 1033-35 (11th Cir. 2008) (certifying to Florida Supreme<br />

Court question of whether Florida would apply place of contracting or significant contacts<br />

test to determine the law applicable to insurance coverage for construction defect claim<br />

against contractor).<br />

Regardless of which “choice of law” rule is applied by the court hearing the insurance<br />

coverage suit, the court could decide that the law of a state other than the state in which the<br />

- 17 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!