20.07.2013 Views

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The LDI’s Advisory Letter warned that insurance companies should rely on exclusions to<br />

disclaim coverage only for claims made by “intentional active industrial polluters.” 32 The<br />

Louisiana Commissioner found that the insurance industry had been ignoring its regulatory<br />

promises to apply the exclusion in a principled manner, in cases involving industrial pollution.<br />

The Advisory Letter stressed that the Department would take future action if it was needed to<br />

protect “the integrity of the regulatory process”:<br />

The appropriate use of standard pollution exclusions in claims<br />

handling is an issue of grave concern. The [Louisiana Department<br />

of Insurance] will take such action as is necessary to assure that the<br />

integrity of the regulatory process is not undermined. 33<br />

Clarifications (but not Reductions) of Coverage<br />

Contrary to arguments sometimes advanced by insurers, insurance companies do not<br />

charge premiums for an endorsement called the “Amendment of Pollution Exclusion – Exception<br />

for Building Heating Equipment.” This mandatory endorsement makes clear that liability for so-<br />

called “puff-backs” from heating equipment remained covered by CGL policies notwithstanding<br />

the APE. For example, the LDI complained to ISO when it learned that insurance companies<br />

were using the APE to deny coverage for such incidents. Because the LDI had based its<br />

32<br />

State of Louisiana Advisory Letter No. 97-91 at 3-4 (June 4, 1997) (posted at<br />

. See also<br />

Advisory Letter No. 01-01 (warning about “excessive use” of total pollution exclusion).<br />

33<br />

Id. at 2 (emphasis added). See also C. Noel Wertz, The Role of Regulators in Environmental<br />

Claims, 7 Coverage, No. 3, at 27 (Nov./Dec. 1997) (available on Lexis/Nexis) (explaining LDI=s<br />

position regarding the polluter’s exclusions); John A. MacDonald, The Assault on the Insurance<br />

Regulatory and Judicial Systems: Three Decades of Broken Insurance Industry Promises and<br />

Regulatory and <strong>Litigation</strong> Deceit in Pollution Cases, 7 Coverage, No. 6, at 3 (Nov./Dec. 1997)<br />

(available on Lexis/Nexis).<br />

- 12 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!