20.07.2013 Views

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BACKGROUND<br />

PROCEDURE<br />

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION: A DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE<br />

William Schuette<br />

Jones, Walker, Waechter, Carrier & Denegre<br />

8555 United Plaza Blvd.<br />

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809<br />

225.248.2056<br />

wschuette@joneswalker.com<br />

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict <strong>Litigation</strong> (JPML) was created by Congress in 1968, 28<br />

USC 1407. It is composed of seven federal district or appellate court judges selected by<br />

the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. On its own initiative or on motion<br />

of a litigant, the JPML may take notice that multiple suits pending in the district courts<br />

of the United States present one or more common factual issues and order those<br />

proceedings consolidated for pretrial proceedings. Based on various factors, the JPML<br />

selects a venue and judge to which all pending and future cases presenting the common<br />

factual issues are transferred.<br />

The purpose of the multidistrict litigation procedure is to reduce the costs and<br />

possibility of inconsistent rulings inherent in repetitive litigation. Since its inception, the<br />

multidistrict litigation procedure has been used in a variety of types of cases including<br />

products liability, intellectual property, automotive recalls, securities, antitrust,<br />

commercial fraud, medical devices and pharmaceutical.<br />

With some modifications primarily related to the transfer to and remand from the MDL<br />

and the manner of filing and serving pleadings the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure<br />

apply. A copy of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel of Multidistrict <strong>Litigation</strong> is<br />

attached. Also attached is a copy of the FAQ page from the JPML’s web site.<br />

DIFFERENCES FROM CLASS ACTIONS<br />

The standards for establishing an MDL proceeding are much broader than those<br />

required for certification of a class action. Rather than a showing of numerosity<br />

necessary for a class action, an MDL requires only two or more federal proceedings. A<br />

class action requires a finding that the common questions of law and fact outweigh the<br />

individual issues whereas an MDL only requires that there be some common question of<br />

fact. These differences make the MDL available in far more situations than those in<br />

which a class action could be certified.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!