20.07.2013 Views

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“We’re trying to get the federal government involved, help these people out,” he added. “We must<br />

start with something drastic to get peoples’ attention, to get this problem recognized.”<br />

In Manatee, neighborhoods where tainted drywall has been reported include Heritage Harbour<br />

and Lakewood Ranch.<br />

The text of each amendment was the same: “Property owners, contractors, subcontractors,<br />

suppliers, or other installers of drywall will not be liable for defective drywall causing personal<br />

injury or damage to property unless the property owners, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers or<br />

other installers knew or should have known that the drywall was defective. The provisions of this<br />

section shall apply to any complaint filed after January 1, 2009. This section does not apply to<br />

manufacturers of defective drywall.”<br />

Ryan argued that the amendments violated homeowners’ rights.<br />

“The important point of this amendment is it would have turned upside down long-standing Florida<br />

law, where such builders and contractors are responsible when they supply defective products to<br />

a homeowner,” said Ryan, an attorney with Krupnick, Campbell, Malone, Buser, Slama, Hancock,<br />

Liberman & McKee. “It would have eliminated the strict liability standards that have existed for<br />

100 years in Florida.”<br />

The amendments even attracted the attention of Broward County Mayor Stacy Ritter, who<br />

interrupted an April 28 meeting of the Broward County Commission when she learned about one<br />

of them. She called it “completely appalling.”<br />

“First of all, these people have <strong>Chinese</strong> drywall in their homes, and the developers are the ones<br />

who installed it, and they shouldn’t be absolved from liability . . .” she said, according to<br />

transcripts of the meeting.<br />

After hearing the amendment read aloud, one commissioner said it sounded “like that would<br />

render literally nobody responsible for this.”<br />

Sen. Cary Baker, R-Eustis, said he was not fully aware of the nature of the amendment Bennett<br />

had filed in connection with one of his bills, Senate Bill 674.<br />

“I guess I want to make it clear, it wasn’t my amendment, we never discussed it,” he said.<br />

Bennett said he had mentioned it to Baker, but was not sure that Baker had remembered the<br />

conversation.<br />

And Baker did say that the amendment’s premise “makes absolute sense.”<br />

“If you’re a small contractor and you buy a product, you have no way of doing chemical tests, it<br />

really is the manufacturer that is responsible,” Baker said.<br />

And Bennett’s view of Ryan? “I suggest Michael Ryan learn how to negotiate and to protect<br />

people, versus worrying where his lawsuit’s going to be,” Bennett noted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!