20.07.2013 Views

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

Is My Drywall Chinese? - HB Litigation Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to test for, monitor, clean up, remove, contain, treat, detoxify or<br />

neutralize, or in any way respond to, or assess the effects of,<br />

“pollutants.”<br />

(2) Any loss, cost or expense arising out of any:<br />

(a) Request, demand, order or statutory or regulatory requirement that any<br />

insured or others test for, monitor, clean up, remove, contain, treat,<br />

detoxify or neutralize, or in any way respond to, or assess the effects<br />

of, “pollutants”; or<br />

(b) Claim or “suit” by or on behalf of a governmental authority for<br />

damages because of testing for, monitoring, cleaning up, removing,<br />

containing, treating, detoxifying or neutralizing, or in any way<br />

responding to, or assessing the effects of, “pollutants.”<br />

However, this paragraph does not apply to liability for damages because of<br />

“property damage” that the insured would have in the absence of such request,<br />

demand, order or statutory or regulatory requirement, or such claim or “suit”<br />

by or on behalf of a governmental authority. 2<br />

A. Traditional or Literal Interpretation<br />

The most important factor in whether the absolute pollution exclusion will apply to<br />

claims against a particular contractor based on <strong>Chinese</strong> drywall will be which state’s law is<br />

applied to the contractor’s claim for coverage. The courts of several states construe the<br />

absolute pollution exclusion literally, despite the resulting application of the exclusion to<br />

harm that is well beyond the liability for traditional environmental pollution that gave rise to<br />

the exclusion. These courts generally refuse to consider extrinsic evidence showing that the<br />

insurance industry assured insurance regulators and others when the exclusion was being<br />

adopted that the exclusion applied only to traditional pollution and would not be applied<br />

according to its literal terms. Substances held to be “pollutants” by such courts include<br />

ammonia, carbon monoxide, adhesives, asbestos, cement or cement components, paint<br />

2 The term “pollutants” is defined in part to mean a “solid, liquid, gaseous or thermal<br />

irritant or contaminant.” The definition specifically refers to smoke, vapor, soot, fumes,<br />

acids, alkalis, chemicals, and waste, defined as including material to be recycled, reclaimed<br />

or reconditioned, as examples of irritants or contaminants.<br />

- 10 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!