Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
sustainability goals and objectives in strategic and<br />
operational plans — and from the bottom up —<br />
<strong>for</strong> example, by being alert and responsive to and<br />
rewarding employees’ SOI ideas and initiatives (Florida<br />
et al., 2001; Haanes et al., 2011). So, <strong>for</strong> sustainability<br />
to be strategically embedded, reward systems and<br />
incentives need to reflect the focus on sustainability.<br />
Some firms are more developed in this sphere than<br />
others:<br />
In Practice<br />
In a US study of 41 Fortune 200 companies,<br />
only about one-quarter of firms had<br />
incentives <strong>for</strong> environmental per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
that extended to managers outside of<br />
the environmental function. Intel links<br />
individual compensation to environmental<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance, funds innovative environmental<br />
projects and rewards employees who deliver<br />
significant sustainable impact. Sixty per cent<br />
of the remuneration of the CEO of Florida<br />
Ice & Farm is tied to per<strong>for</strong>mance on triple<br />
bottom line indicators. Adapted from Baya<br />
and Gruman (2011); Lent and Wells (1992).<br />
3. Revisit and reframe the business model and<br />
modes of governance to acknowledge the firm’s<br />
commitment to sustainability<br />
Typically, contemporary business models are<br />
inappropriately conceived to deliver sustainable<br />
businesses. As a result, Organizational Trans<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
innovators revisit and reframe their business model.<br />
A novel paradigm has emerged in recent years: a<br />
business that attends equally to social, economic and<br />
environmental considerations (Bertens & Statema,<br />
2011; Esslinger, 2011; Stubbs & Cocklin, 2008).<br />
8 See http://www.bcorporation.net/<br />
This model of the sustainable business remains unclear<br />
and, <strong>for</strong> Birkin et al. (2009) at least, no business claims<br />
to be fully realizing or implementing a business model<br />
<strong>for</strong> sustainable development. Nevertheless, progressive<br />
firms are experimenting in this area (OECD, 2010), as<br />
typified by the following emergent characteristics:<br />
• Drawing on TBL considerations in defining its<br />
purpose<br />
• Using a TBL approach in measuring per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
• Considering the needs of all stakeholders rather<br />
than just those who hold shares<br />
• Regarding stakeholder engagement and<br />
collaboration as necessary<br />
• Treating nature as a stakeholder<br />
• Driving the cultural and structural changes<br />
necessary to implement sustainability through<br />
leaders or champions<br />
• Engaging both a systems-level and a firm-level<br />
perspective (Stubbs & Cocklin, 2008)<br />
Some firms are experimenting with new modes of<br />
governance that explicitly integrate sustainability. In the<br />
United States, a new legal <strong>for</strong>m, the B Corporation, 8<br />
has recently emerged to legally oblige committed firms<br />
to deliver societal benefits. B Corporations address two<br />
critical problems:<br />
• Current corporate law makes it difficult <strong>for</strong><br />
businesses to consider the interests of employees,<br />
the community and the environment when making<br />
decisions.<br />
• The lack of transparent standards makes it difficult<br />
to distinguish between a good company and good<br />
marketing.<br />
Innovating <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sustainability</strong> 41