Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

More documents

Recommendations

Info

institutional redesign of not only the firm but also the social, economic and political institutional infrastructures in which firms are located. Achieving such changes is likely beyond the individual capacities of most firms. 4. Initiate, mobilize, lead and inspire systems changes The ultimate objectives of sustainability may lie beyond the individual capacity of firms to achieve, but firms’ role as Systems Builders becomes one of initiating, mobilizing, inspiring and leading this change: business is uniquely placed – more than government or civil society – to lead toward a sustainable world (Hart, 2010). Sustainable development cannot logically be an attribute of a single firm or entity but can only be properly applied at the global level (Lamming, Faruk & Cousins, 1999). Systems Builders are not wholly or solely responsible for addressing sustainability challenges, but firms leading in sustainability practice do not only focus internally but also look to lead and inspire change in the wider societal, economic, technical and environmental management systems. 5. Apply equal weight to all aspects of the TBL in organizational thinking and decision-making The implications for innovation are profound, especially in terms of treating the TBL dimensions with equal importance and recognizing social aspects that are largely neglected by Operational Optimizers. Research on such innovation uses different rhetoric around the purpose of business. McDonough and Braungart (2002: 1), for example, write about the need for “nurturing solutions very different to the often outrageous initiatives that harm the environment.” Chang (2010) suggests moving away from metaphors of war and competition, which can inappropriately inform leaders’ decisionmaking, and instead using metaphors that describe businesses as part of a co-operative community based on relationships. Innovating for Sustainability 56
discussion Firms are re-embedding themselves in society. Most firms haven’t moved beyond the Operational Optimizer context. But firms are experimenting with greater innovation. This review highlights limitations of the literature: little attention to social aspects of sustainability, and little attention to industries other than manufacturing and process. Innovating for Sustainability 57
Page 1 and 2:
innovating for sustainability A Sys
Page 3 and 4:
Through innovation, companies can b
Page 5 and 6: Dear Reader, I’m pleased to share
Page 7 and 8: introduction This systematic review
Page 9 and 10: To address the needs of all firms,
Page 11 and 12: origins of SOI and its relation to
Page 13 and 14: customers or the acquisition of new
Page 15 and 16: We developed our model of contexts
Page 17 and 18: From the models reviewed, we envisi
Page 19 and 20: Dimension 2: Stand-alone/integrated
Page 21 and 22: OPERATIONAL OPTIMIZATION ORGANIZATI
Page 23 and 24: The previous chapters presented a m
Page 25 and 26: Internally, SOI can require working
Page 27 and 28: Operational Optimizers must source
Page 29 and 30: 2. Use available tools such as envi
Page 31 and 32: LCA has multiple variants (Kaval, 2
Page 33 and 34: • Reducing energy and chemical us
Page 35 and 36: 4. Ensure functionality is not comp
Page 37 and 38: In the Organizational Transformatio
Page 39 and 40: In Practice The contribution of lon
Page 41 and 42: sustainability goals and objectives
Page 43 and 44: eports or as social and environment
Page 45 and 46: PROCESS INNOVATION A number of cate
Page 47 and 48: In Practice The cradle-to-cradle me
Page 49 and 50: In Practice InterfaceFLOR is gradua
Page 51 and 52: In Practice There is a potentially
Page 53 and 54: development on the needs of the poo
Page 55: such innovations. Much more difficu
Page 59 and 60: competitive advantages. Third, firm
Page 61 and 62: previous reviews Earlier literature
Page 63 and 64: The current study extends these pre
Page 65 and 66: additional materials The appendices
Page 67 and 68: appendix 1: methodology The systema
Page 69 and 70: SEARCHING THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
Page 71 and 72: Search methods We used the followin
Page 73 and 74: At the outset of this project, the
Page 75 and 76: Data were coded according to biblio
Page 77 and 78: Table 8 JOURNALS PROVIDING ONLY A S
Page 79 and 80: DESIGN OF STUDIES Sectoral distribu
Page 81 and 82: which speaks to the contestation ar
Page 83 and 84: The studies in our sample are mixed
Page 85 and 86: THE ELEMENTS OF INNOVATION A tradit
Page 87 and 88: appendix 3: definitions of SOI This
Page 89 and 90: SUSTAINABILITY-RELATED AND SUSTAINA
Page 91 and 92: STUDY MODEL Alexander Ballard Ltd.
Page 93 and 94: appendix 6: frugal, reverse and soc
Page 95 and 96: Benyus, J.M. (1997). Biomimicry: in
Page 97 and 98: Del Río, P., Carrillo-Hermosilla,
Page 99 and 100: Hunt, C.B. & Auster, E.R. (1990). P
Page 101 and 102: Machiba, T. (2010). Eco-innovation
Page 103 and 104: Reay, T., Berta, W. & Kohn, M.K. (2
Page 105 and 106: Wagner, M. (2007). On the relations
Page 107:
Network for Business Sustainability
show all

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?