Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE ELEMENTS OF INNOVATION<br />
A traditional model of innovation distinguishes between<br />
core elements or steps and broader enabling processes<br />
in the organization (Tidd and Bessant, 2009). The core<br />
elements are:<br />
• Search: What are the drivers and how can we find<br />
opportunities <strong>for</strong> SOI?<br />
• Select: What are we going to do and why?<br />
• Implement: How are we going to make it happen?<br />
• Capture: How are we going to receive the benefits<br />
from it?<br />
Which are nested within a set of enabling processes:<br />
• Strategy: Is the strategy clear, is it supported and<br />
communicated?<br />
• Culture: is the culture conducive to SOI?<br />
Studies of SOI predominantly focus on the core<br />
elements together rather than a single element (Figure<br />
16). We can interpret this lack of more nuanced<br />
investigations of particular elements as an indication of<br />
the immaturity of the field.<br />
Figure 16<br />
STUDIES ADDRESSING THE ELEMENTS OF<br />
INNOVATION<br />
Core elements<br />
Mix<br />
Enabling processes<br />
Not the focus of the study<br />
12<br />
19<br />
29<br />
40<br />
INNOVATION NOVELTY<br />
To capture the novelty of the innovations included<br />
in selected studies, we utilize Machiba’s (2010)<br />
classification developed expressly <strong>for</strong> the context of<br />
sustainable innovation. Machiba describes four degrees<br />
of novelty, reflected by the innovation moving from<br />
small, progressive product and process adjustments<br />
(modification) through more significant changes (redesign<br />
and alternatives) to the design and introduction<br />
of something entirely new (creation).<br />
Because of the numbers of mixed studies, innovation<br />
novelty has not proven to be a useful analytic<br />
dimension in this review (Figure 17). Most studies<br />
report on innovations that exhibit mixed degrees of<br />
novelty, principally modifications and alternatives. Of<br />
the seven creation innovations, six are reported in<br />
papers published since 2010, the seventh having been<br />
published in 2000. Nine of the 12 redesign innovation<br />
studies have been published since 2004.<br />
Figure 17<br />
NOVELTY OF INNOVATION IN SELECTED<br />
STUDIES<br />
Innovating <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sustainability</strong> 85