Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

More documents

Recommendations

Info

appendix 4: models of sustainability-oriented innovation After Kolk and Mauser (2002) STUDY MODEL Hunt and Auster (1990)* • Beginner • Firefighter • Concerned citizen Roome (1992)* • Non-compliance • Compliance • Compliance-plus Elkington (1994)* • Ignorance • Awakening • Denial • Guilt reduction/displacement behaviour/tokenism Shrivastava and Hart (1995)* • Band aid • More serious (Hart, 1997) • Pollution prevention • Product stewardship Winn and Angell (2000)* • Deliberate reactive greening • Unrealized greening Low et al. (2001) • Incremental improvements • Redesign of existing product concepts Keijzers (2002) • Sanitize • Control Dunphy et al. (2003) 23 • Rejection • Non-responsiveness • Compliance Alakeson and Sherwin (2004) Tukker and Tischner (2006) • Single issue approach • Ad hoc approach • System optimization • System re-design Blake (2006) • Protector • Builder 23 As reported in Holton, Glass, & Price, 2010. • Pragmatist • Pro-activist • Commercial and environmental excellence • Leading edge • Conversion • Integration • Deep change • Clean technology • Emergent active greening • Deliberate proactive greening • Alternative fulfilment of function • Designs completely fitting in the sustainable society • Integrate • Efficiency • Strategic proactivity • The sustaining corporation • Sustainability tools • Strategic integration • System innovation • Innovator Innovating for Sustainability 90
STUDY MODEL Alexander Ballard Ltd. (2008) • Core-business focused • Stakeholder responsive • Efficient management Nidumolu et al. (2009) • Viewing compliance as opportunity • Making value chains sustainable • Designing sustainable products and services Morton and Grayson (2009) • Deniers (it’s not our fault) • Compliers (we’ll only do what we have to) • Case-makers (it’s the business) • Breakthrough projects • Strategic resilience • Champion organization • Developing new business models • Creating next practice platforms • Innovators (it gives us a competitive advantage) • Trail-blazers (we need to make sure everybody does it) Machiba (2010) • Technological change • Socio-technological change Mani et al. (2010) • Initial • Managed • Defined Carrillo-Hermosilla et al. (2010) • Component addition • Sub-system change Baya and Gruman (2011) • Compliance • Obligations Seebode et al. (2012) • Exploit • Bounded exploration Elkington (2012) • Eureka • Experiment • Enterprise Note: *Included in Kolk and Mauser’s original review • Quantitatively managed • Optimizing • System change • Efficiency • Leadership • Reframing • Co-evolution • Ecosystem • Economy Innovating for Sustainability 91
Page 1 and 2:
innovating for sustainability A Sys
Page 3 and 4:
Through innovation, companies can b
Page 5 and 6:
Dear Reader, I’m pleased to share
Page 7 and 8:
introduction This systematic review
Page 9 and 10:
To address the needs of all firms,
Page 11 and 12:
origins of SOI and its relation to
Page 13 and 14:
customers or the acquisition of new
Page 15 and 16:
We developed our model of contexts
Page 17 and 18:
From the models reviewed, we envisi
Page 19 and 20:
Dimension 2: Stand-alone/integrated
Page 21 and 22:
OPERATIONAL OPTIMIZATION ORGANIZATI
Page 23 and 24:
The previous chapters presented a m
Page 25 and 26:
Internally, SOI can require working
Page 27 and 28:
Operational Optimizers must source
Page 29 and 30:
2. Use available tools such as envi
Page 31 and 32:
LCA has multiple variants (Kaval, 2
Page 33 and 34:
• Reducing energy and chemical us
Page 35 and 36:
4. Ensure functionality is not comp
Page 37 and 38:
In the Organizational Transformatio
Page 39 and 40: In Practice The contribution of lon
Page 41 and 42: sustainability goals and objectives
Page 43 and 44: eports or as social and environment
Page 45 and 46: PROCESS INNOVATION A number of cate
Page 47 and 48: In Practice The cradle-to-cradle me
Page 49 and 50: In Practice InterfaceFLOR is gradua
Page 51 and 52: In Practice There is a potentially
Page 53 and 54: development on the needs of the poo
Page 55 and 56: such innovations. Much more difficu
Page 57 and 58: discussion Firms are re-embedding t
Page 59 and 60: competitive advantages. Third, firm
Page 61 and 62: previous reviews Earlier literature
Page 63 and 64: The current study extends these pre
Page 65 and 66: additional materials The appendices
Page 67 and 68: appendix 1: methodology The systema
Page 69 and 70: SEARCHING THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
Page 71 and 72: Search methods We used the followin
Page 73 and 74: At the outset of this project, the
Page 75 and 76: Data were coded according to biblio
Page 77 and 78: Table 8 JOURNALS PROVIDING ONLY A S
Page 79 and 80: DESIGN OF STUDIES Sectoral distribu
Page 81 and 82: which speaks to the contestation ar
Page 83 and 84: The studies in our sample are mixed
Page 85 and 86: THE ELEMENTS OF INNOVATION A tradit
Page 87 and 88: appendix 3: definitions of SOI This
Page 89: SUSTAINABILITY-RELATED AND SUSTAINA
Page 93 and 94: appendix 6: frugal, reverse and soc
Page 95 and 96: Benyus, J.M. (1997). Biomimicry: in
Page 97 and 98: Del Río, P., Carrillo-Hermosilla,
Page 99 and 100: Hunt, C.B. & Auster, E.R. (1990). P
Page 101 and 102: Machiba, T. (2010). Eco-innovation
Page 103 and 104: Reay, T., Berta, W. & Kohn, M.K. (2
Page 105 and 106: Wagner, M. (2007). On the relations
Page 107: Network for Business Sustainability
show all

Systematic Review - Network for Business Sustainability

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?