24.07.2013 Views

Onto.PT: Towards the Automatic Construction of a Lexical Ontology ...

Onto.PT: Towards the Automatic Construction of a Lexical Ontology ...

Onto.PT: Towards the Automatic Construction of a Lexical Ontology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.2. <strong>Onto</strong>logising performance 127<br />

% <strong>of</strong> N Algorithm Precision (%) Recall (%) F1(%) F0.5(%) RF1(%)<br />

RP 90.0 82.6 86.1 88.4 90.0<br />

AC 93.3 90.0 91.6 92.6 93.3<br />

RP+AC 96.6 92.8 94.8 95.8 96.6<br />

50% NT 94.0 86.1 89.9 92.3 94.0<br />

NT+AC 95.9 88.1 91.8 94.2 95.9<br />

PR 70.6 73.4 72.0 71.1 70.6<br />

MD 73.1 85.3 78.8 75.2 73.1<br />

RP 87.0 61.4 72.0 80.3 82.2<br />

AC 90.6 84.1 87.2 89.2 90.6<br />

RP+AC 93.5 89.3 91.3 92.6 93.5<br />

25% NT 91.3 78.4 84.3 88-4 91.3<br />

NT+AC 92.4 84.3 88.2 90.6 92.4<br />

PR 70.6 73.6 72.1 71.2 70.6<br />

MD 70.2 85.6 77.1 72.8 70.2<br />

RP 85.1 49.8 62.8 74.5 75.0<br />

AC 86.0 74.9 80.1 83.5 86.0<br />

RP+AC 88.4 85.6 87.0 88.4 88.4<br />

12.5% NT 87.3 66.7 75.6 82.2 85.9<br />

NT+AC 84.5 82.6 83.5 84.1 84.5<br />

PR 67.0 71.1 69.0 67.7 67.0<br />

MD 63.8 80.3 71.1 66.6 63.8<br />

Table 7.7: Results <strong>of</strong> ontologising 800 antonymy tb-triples, between adjectives, <strong>of</strong><br />

TeP in TeP, using only part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TeP’s antonymy relations as a lexical network.<br />

% <strong>of</strong> N Algorithm Precision (%) Recall (%) F1(%) F0.5(%) RF1(%)<br />

RP 94.2 85.7 89.8 92.3 94.2<br />

AC 97.3 80.5 88.1 93.4 96.5<br />

RP+AC 97.5 87.2 92.1 95.2 97.5<br />

50% NT 95.1 73.7 83.1 89.9 93.1<br />

NT+AC 93.9 81.2 87.1 91.1 93.9<br />

PR 91.0 91.0 91.0 91.0 91.0<br />

MD 70.6 90.2 79.2 73.8 70.6<br />

RP 93.8 78.9 85.7 90.4 93.7<br />

AC 94.9 69.9 80.5 88.6 90.9<br />

RP+AC 95.9 88.7 92.2 94.4 95.9<br />

25% NT 93.2 51.9 66.7 80.4 83.1<br />

NT+AC 83.1 81.2 82.1 82.7 83.1<br />

PR 87.5 89.5 88.5 87.9 87.5<br />

MD 71.7 89.5 79.6 74.7 71.7<br />

RP 96.0 72.9 82.9 90.3 93.3<br />

AC 94.3 49.6 65.0 79.9 81.4<br />

RP+AC 96.7 85.7 90.8 94.2 96.1<br />

12.5% NT 90.5 28.6 43.4 63.1 69.9<br />

NT+AC 73.0 81.2 76.9 74.5 73.0<br />

PR 85.2 91.0 88.0 86.3 85.2<br />

MD 76.8 87.2 81.7 78.7 76.8<br />

Table 7.8: Results <strong>of</strong> ontologising 476 antonymy tb-triples, between adverbs, <strong>of</strong> TeP<br />

in TeP, using only part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TeP’s antonymy relations as a lexical network.<br />

Table 7.9 shows <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> what can be seen as a real scenario, because <strong>the</strong><br />

lexical network used, CARTÃO, was extracted automatically from a different source<br />

than <strong>the</strong> synsets. In this run, RP is <strong>the</strong> most precise algorithm in a trade-<strong>of</strong>f for lower<br />

recall, because it only uses information <strong>of</strong> relations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same type <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tb-triple.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!