26.07.2013 Views

WiMax Operator's Manual

WiMax Operator's Manual

WiMax Operator's Manual

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 4 ■ SETTING UP PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 79<br />

T1 Backhaul over Copper<br />

I mention this unsatisfactory expedient, T1 backhaul over copper, only because it has been<br />

used in the past. A T1 connection affords the user a throughput rate of only 1.5Mbps per second,<br />

a tiny fraction of the speeds supported by 802.16. Aggregations of T1s, which are offered<br />

by many telcos, are of course better, but they are still woefully inadequate. I simply do not see<br />

how a network operator can possibly succeed with such a legacy solution and strongly advise<br />

operators to exclude T1 categorically as a method of backhaul.<br />

Determining Basic Network Architecture<br />

I have already mentioned the basic network architectures: point-to-point, point-to-consecutivepoint,<br />

point-to-multipoint, and mesh. While hybrids consisting of one or more topologies are<br />

certainly possible, generally a single architecture is chosen for the entire locale to be served,<br />

and the choice reflects not just technical considerations but the nature and composition of the<br />

local market.<br />

The band or bands in which the network operator is transmitting limits the choice of network<br />

architecture. For example, transmissions in the highest band now commonly in use,<br />

59GHz to 64GHz, can never be point-to-multipoint because spreading the beam to accommodate<br />

such an architecture would result in unacceptably short range and also a failure to reach<br />

many potential customers because of strict line-of-sight considerations. Similarly, a mesh<br />

architecture, while technically feasible in the millimeter wave frequencies, is apt to be quite<br />

expensive because each node essentially becomes a base station (one U.K. manufacturer,<br />

Radiant Networks, now out of business, did make a 28GHz mesh product, however). Finally,<br />

point-to-point connections are rarely encountered below 3GHz though they certainly are possible,<br />

because the bandwidth lends itself to point-to-multipoint deployments and the profit<br />

potential of the latter is generally much greater than that associated with the sale of the total<br />

bandwidth to a single customer via a narrow-beam bridge link.<br />

Point-to-Multipoint<br />

For networks utilizing low microwave frequencies, a point-to-multipoint architecture will represent<br />

the norm. Point-to-multipoint will enable the network operator to reach the greatest<br />

number of subscribers at the lowest cost and will sharply limit the number of routers and<br />

switches required for the network. Figure 4-3 shows a point-to-multipoint network.<br />

Point-to-multipoint deployments have frequently been advocated for millimeter wave<br />

frequencies as well, but few have actually been built. The problem lies in the topography of<br />

most large cities, which would be the prime markets for such services. Given the high cost of<br />

base stations, minimally $100,000 for equipment alone, operators will probably be unable to<br />

populate the market with more than two or three such facilities. But at the same time it will be<br />

hard to reach all potential customers within the radius of a given base station because of blockage.<br />

Because of the unhappy experiences of first-generation LMDS network operators in<br />

attempting to sign a sufficient number of customers to achieve profitability, many authorities<br />

today have concluded that point-to-multipoint architectures are seldom if ever advisable for<br />

millimeter wave networks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!