26.07.2013 Views

WiMax Operator's Manual

WiMax Operator's Manual

WiMax Operator's Manual

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 4 ■ SETTING UP PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 77<br />

Hybrid Fiber Coax<br />

In a few locations, mostly in the United States, a new type of hybrid fiber-cable system operator<br />

known as an overbuilder may offer packet services capable of speeds in the 10–30Mbps range,<br />

sufficient for backhaul in some instances. Few such operators guarantee quality of service,<br />

however, and here again the cable operator is likely to be competing for the same access customer<br />

as the broadband wireless operator.<br />

VDSL<br />

VDSL, with speeds in excess of 50Mbps in some cases, might also be considered for backhaul<br />

where available, but availability is limited as yet. Even more limited opportunities exist for utilizing<br />

a power line carrier for backhaul, a technology where data is transmitted over AC power<br />

lines at throughput speeds as high as 30Mbps. One New England–based company named<br />

Amperion is pursuing a strategy of combining powerline carrier backhaul with wireless broadband<br />

access, but to date it has achieved few commercial deployments. Bear in mind that any<br />

such arrangement requires the active participation of the local electrical utility, and while such<br />

entities have long evinced interest in gaining a stake in the communications business, few have<br />

made major commitments to doing so.<br />

Wireless Bridge Connections<br />

Wireless broadband operators, can, if they so choose, pursue a wireless pure play in regard<br />

to backhaul and utilize wireless point-to-point “bridge” connections from the base station to<br />

a central office. They can do so using their own spectrum, or they may elect to use another<br />

wireless service provider, preferably one utilizing millimeter microwave equipment or freespace<br />

optics.<br />

Such bridge connections can utilize either low microwave or millimeter wave frequencies<br />

and will normally employ the full available spectrum in the one airlink. Very high-gain,<br />

narrow-beam antennas are the rule here, and maximum transmission distances are multiples<br />

of the radii of the cells being backhauled. Wireless bridge backhaul connections exceeding 30<br />

miles are feasible in some instances.<br />

The same spectrum can be used for backhaul as is used for access, but the prevailing practice<br />

is to use a dedicated band to avoid interference since the backhaul has the potential to<br />

interfere with every subscriber in the cell inasmuch as it reuses all of the spectrum. The 5.8<br />

U-NII band is frequently assigned to backhaul and offers a good combination of bandwidth<br />

and range—100 megahertz (MHz) and more than 20 miles, best case. Other frequencies<br />

favored for backhaul purposes include the 18GHz and 23GHz licensed bands where licenses<br />

are fairly easily obtainable in the United States, the 24GHz unlicensed band, the 28GHz–31GHz<br />

Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) bands, the 38GHz and 39GHz bands, and the<br />

unlicensed band at 60GHz. In all of these bands at least 100MHz of spectrum is available and<br />

interference is minimal. Range is an issue, however, especially as one goes higher in frequency,<br />

and in the highest band, centered at 60GHz, distance should not exceed a kilometer.<br />

The cost of radios for the millimeter wave regions is significantly higher than for the lower<br />

microwave bands, and bridge links are minimally several thousand dollars apiece. In the case<br />

of LMDS, 38GHz, and 39GHz, the cost is apt to be much higher, approaching $100,000, though<br />

that must be balanced against the generous allocations of bandwidth and resultant high<br />

throughputs and the fact that the bridge equipment represents a one-time capital cost along<br />

with the generally fairly minimal recurrent costs associated with roof rights.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!