26.07.2013 Views

WiMax Operator's Manual

WiMax Operator's Manual

WiMax Operator's Manual

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 CHAPTER 5 ■ STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESSFUL DEPLOYMENT OF PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURES<br />

I point out, however, that the cells deployed within broadband wireless networks are usually<br />

larger than those in cellular telephone networks.<br />

A Note on Channel Assignments from One Cell to Another Concerning this matter of frequency reuse,<br />

it should be understood that channels, according to standard engineering practice, cannot be<br />

reused from cell to cell because a signal fades only gradually over distance and will not be sufficiently<br />

attenuated so as not to cause grave interference if another user tries to occupy the<br />

same channel in an adjacent cell. Therefore, a channel would normally be reused only one cell<br />

diameter away at best. Figure 5-1 shows frequency reuse patterns in a cellular network; for<br />

simplicity’s sake, it displays only four channels. The exception would occur when the cell was<br />

divided into sectors, which are discussed next.<br />

Figure 5-1. Frequency reuse within a cellular architecture<br />

Today this standard engineering practice has been subject to some modification because<br />

of the appearance of advanced modulation techniques such as direct sequence, Code-Division<br />

Multiple Access (CDMA), and orthogonal frequency division modulation (OFDM); the introduction<br />

of polarization diversity; and the emergence of smart antenna technology. All these<br />

techniques, described in detail later in this chapter, increase the immunity of a transmission<br />

from interference and allow reuse of a channel at reduced distances—in other words, less than<br />

one cell diameter away. Reuse, at least within certain sectors in adjacent cells, does then in fact<br />

become possible, though certain minimum distances still have to be maintained. Coincidentally,<br />

simple rules of thumb for channel spacing become increasingly difficult to formulate.<br />

As it happens, numerous schemes and formulae have been developed for cellular telephone<br />

networks for optimizing frequency reuse patterns, but all of these, understandably, are<br />

optimized for mobility and must take into account the fact that a subscriber terminal must be<br />

able to “see” two base stations simultaneously at the boundary of a cell in order to initiate a<br />

handoff. As a result, such techniques cannot be imported into the broadband fixed wireless<br />

arena without extensive modification. Considerably less attention has been given to maximizing<br />

frequency reuse in fixed broadband networks through improved calculations for base<br />

station placement or through new protocols for dynamic channel assignment.<br />

Part of the problem has to do with the ad hoc nature of most fixed wireless broadband<br />

networks to date. Typically, wireless broadband networks have been the product of startup<br />

companies with limited resources that have tended to add capacity as needed with no overall<br />

plan of what a fully loaded network would look like and with no staff with either the training,<br />

inclination, or mandate to refine the formulae used by cellular network engineers to perform<br />

cell mapping and base station distribution. The tendency instead has been to rely on relatively<br />

crude cell-splitting techniques to accommodate increased traffic and, ironically, on ultrasophisticated<br />

adaptive modulation and beam steering technologies for the same purpose,<br />

neither of which, incidentally, require much engineering skill on the part of the network

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!