13.08.2013 Views

environmental assessment for the hog lake road improvement project

environmental assessment for the hog lake road improvement project

environmental assessment for the hog lake road improvement project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ramona Hog Lake Road Improvement Project August 2011<br />

Resource Proposed Action Alternative “No Action” Alternative<br />

Hydrology/Soils<br />

Heritage<br />

than on an unpaved one.<br />

Improved vehicle gas mileage and<br />

reduction in exhaust emissions.<br />

Total impacts are estimated at<br />

4,288 sf (0.098 ac.) federal/ACOE<br />

and 6,429 sf (0.148 ac.)<br />

state/CDFG jurisdictional area.<br />

It is likely that sedimentation may<br />

be reduced over <strong>the</strong> long-term and<br />

erosion and hazardous material<br />

discharge reduced or prevented.<br />

No cultural resources were<br />

identified within <strong>the</strong> Project APE,<br />

so no effects to heritage<br />

resources.<br />

Human Health and Safety<br />

The <strong>road</strong> would be more<br />

accessible in all wea<strong>the</strong>r<br />

conditions. Access <strong>for</strong> emergency<br />

vehicles and response times<br />

would be improved and<br />

evacuation times reduced. Overall<br />

safety <strong>for</strong> residents and visitors<br />

would be improved.<br />

Aes<strong>the</strong>tics<br />

Fire fighting and prevention would<br />

be improved due to improved<br />

access to <strong>the</strong> Reservation and <strong>the</strong><br />

fuel break.<br />

No significant impacts. Views from<br />

<strong>the</strong> nearest residences, <strong>the</strong><br />

Cahuilla Wilderness and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

nearby viewpoints would not be<br />

significantly affected.<br />

Land Use, Ownership, Easements<br />

A long-term, recordable <strong>road</strong><br />

special use easement would be<br />

granted by <strong>the</strong> FS <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> benefit<br />

would add to particulate<br />

pollution.<br />

Damage to <strong>road</strong><br />

structure from erosion<br />

would be expected to<br />

continue at current<br />

levels.<br />

No effects to heritage<br />

resources.<br />

Safety and access would<br />

remain <strong>the</strong> same or<br />

would deteriorate over<br />

time due to fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

erosion damage.<br />

Fire risk would remain<br />

<strong>the</strong> same or increase as<br />

access to <strong>the</strong> area<br />

deteriorates.<br />

No change to <strong>the</strong> current<br />

visual quality of <strong>the</strong> area.<br />

Lacking an authorization<br />

<strong>for</strong> maintenance or use,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Tribe would be<br />

Frank Springer & Associates, Inc. Page 22 of 79 Environmental Assessment

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!