13.08.2013 Views

environmental assessment for the hog lake road improvement project

environmental assessment for the hog lake road improvement project

environmental assessment for the hog lake road improvement project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ramona Hog Lake Road Improvement Project August 2011<br />

Increases in invasive plant species could affect <strong>the</strong> diet of small herbivore, mammal<br />

species by displacing <strong>the</strong>ir primary food sources. Mitigation measures/design<br />

criteria will be employed to reduce <strong>the</strong> risk of invasive plant species (see Table 1:<br />

Mitigation Measures/Design Criteria; Biological Resources). Large areas of<br />

undisturbed vegetation occur in <strong>the</strong> Project vicinity and would be available food<br />

sources <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species.<br />

All wildlife species<br />

All wildlife species in <strong>the</strong> area may experience indirect effects from <strong>road</strong><br />

construction. Increases in noise, chemical emissions and vibration could result in<br />

avoidance or abandonment of <strong>the</strong> area, over <strong>the</strong> short-term. With linear nature of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Project any increase in noise, emissions and/or vibrations would be continually<br />

progressing along <strong>the</strong> Project area, which would limit <strong>the</strong> time any one area would<br />

be exposed. Due to <strong>the</strong> remote location, open area and overall minimal traffic<br />

emissions should disperse. Although some species or individuals may alter<br />

behavior, mitigation measures/design criteria that restrict construction during spring<br />

and summer will reduce impacts to all wildlife during typical reproduction periods.<br />

With incorporated mitigations (see Table 1: Mitigation Measures/Design Criteria;<br />

Biological Resources), <strong>the</strong> short-term period of construction, periodic maintenance<br />

and <strong>the</strong> presence of substantial quality habitat nearby, <strong>the</strong> Project vicinity can<br />

provide sufficient <strong>for</strong>aging and nesting habitat thus indirect effects to wildlife would<br />

be temporary and minimal.<br />

Determination<br />

R5 Sensitive Plants: The proposed Project activities may adversely affect individual<br />

Sensitive Plants, but are not likely to result in a trend toward Federal listing or loss of<br />

viability.<br />

R5 Sensitive Wildlife Species: The Project may affect individuals, but is not likely<br />

to result in a trend toward Federal listing or loss of viability <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species.<br />

Cumulative Effects<br />

No Action and Proposed Action<br />

Cumulative effects on Sensitive and Watch-list Species are similar to those listed in<br />

<strong>the</strong> cumulative effects <strong>for</strong> Quino checkerspot butterfly <strong>for</strong> both <strong>the</strong> No Action<br />

alternative and Proposed Action.<br />

The Proposed Action would add 0.15 acres to <strong>the</strong> cumulative loss of red shank<br />

chaparral habitat in <strong>the</strong> area. Given this small size, <strong>the</strong> proposed action’s<br />

contribution to cumulative effects is not significant.<br />

Frank Springer & Associates, Inc. Page 48 of 79 Environmental Assessment

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!