Soner Bekleric Title of Thesis: Nonlinear Prediction via Volterra Ser
Soner Bekleric Title of Thesis: Nonlinear Prediction via Volterra Ser
Soner Bekleric Title of Thesis: Nonlinear Prediction via Volterra Ser
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.4. 1-D SYNTHETIC AND REAL DATA EXAMPLES 20<br />
Walker equations and Burg’s method with parameter p = 4. Figures 2.3 (d) and 2.3<br />
(e) portray predicted data using linear prediction theory (p = 4) and the associated<br />
modeling error (which is equivalent to the difference between the original data and<br />
the predicted data), respectively. It is clear that the three different prediction<br />
algorithms provide similar results. I did not plot differences between original data<br />
and these methods (Yule-Walker and Burg’s) because the results were quite similar<br />
to those obtained in Figure 2.3 (e).<br />
I also attempt to model data corresponding to the so called Arctic oscillation<br />
(AO)-a time series from 1950 to 1999 <strong>of</strong> sea level pressures. These data are used to<br />
characterize the long term variability <strong>of</strong> nonseasonal sea level oscillations (Thomson,<br />
2004).<br />
Figure 2.4 (a) shows nonlinear AO-a data for a period from 1950 to 1999. The<br />
data consist <strong>of</strong> 104 samples (3 observations per year-January, February, March).<br />
Figures 2.4 (b) and 2.4 (c) illustrate predicted AO values using Yule-Walker equa-<br />
tions and Burg’s algorithm with linear terms (p = 14). Figures 2.4 (d) and 2.4 (e)<br />
represent our attempt to model the data with a linear prediction filter (p = 14) and<br />
the modeling error, respectively. Again, it is clear that the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the time<br />
series cannot be captured by linear prediction methods.