22.08.2013 Views

Dr Faustus of Modern Physics - Department of Speech, Music and ...

Dr Faustus of Modern Physics - Department of Speech, Music and ...

Dr Faustus of Modern Physics - Department of Speech, Music and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

21.4. KANT’S SYNTHETIC A PRIORI 97<br />

As indicated, it is still almost 100 years later unclear if the equality <strong>of</strong><br />

inertial <strong>and</strong> heavy mass as the basic Law underlying general relativity, is a<br />

definition or a fact, a clear sign <strong>of</strong> mastery or the inventor <strong>of</strong> the Law.<br />

21.4 Kant’s Synthetic A Priori<br />

Kant helped Einstein to formulate his double analytic-synthetic axioms <strong>of</strong><br />

relativity by suggesting that there are synthetic propositions which can be<br />

decided to be true before observation <strong>of</strong> reality, referred to as synthetic a<br />

priori propositions. So Kant himself mixed analytic with synthetic, which<br />

Einstein played on so cleverly.<br />

Kant suggests that the truth <strong>of</strong> a synthetic a priori statement is based<br />

on pure intuitions or our a priori formal representations <strong>of</strong> space <strong>and</strong> time.<br />

In other words, we can use our own brains as the test bench for the truth<br />

<strong>of</strong> a non-analytic statement without reference to any exterior reality. Thus<br />

the brain is supposed to check out itself in a self-referential procedure, which<br />

connects to deep questions about mind <strong>and</strong> self...<br />

A synthetic a priori statement could thus be true for all humans with rational<br />

human brains, but not necessarily in all logically possible worlds, where<br />

only analytic statements could be true a priori without exterior observation.<br />

In the spirit <strong>of</strong> Kant we may thus ask if Einstein’s Laws <strong>of</strong> constancy <strong>of</strong><br />

the speed <strong>of</strong> light <strong>and</strong> the equality <strong>of</strong> intertial <strong>and</strong> heavy mass, are synthetic<br />

a priori statements, which we can verify by “pure intuition”? Maybe Einstein<br />

could but it is not all clear that anyone <strong>of</strong> us is able to do so. Maybe Einstein<br />

by “pure intuition” could underst<strong>and</strong> that “space-time is curved”, but my<br />

intuition seems to lack this capability...<br />

In any case, in science it is essential to make a clear distinction between<br />

a definition <strong>and</strong> synthetic statement <strong>and</strong> not flip back an forth using double<br />

definition-synthetic statements. To nevertheless do so represents a deal with<br />

the Devil, which ultimately will take its toll.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!