Dr Faustus of Modern Physics - Department of Speech, Music and ...

211
• If we assume Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle for elementary particles,
then we can theoretically explain an observed interaction between
observer and observed particle. Hence elementary particles obey
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle.
• If we assume that a proton consists of three quarks, then we can theoretically
derive a formula for the observed mass of a proton. Hence a
proton consists of three quarks.
• If we assume that space-time observations of different observers are connected
by the Lorentz transformation of special relativity, then we can
theoretically explain the observation that the speed of light is the same
for all observers. Hence space-time observations of different observers
are connected by the Lorentz transformation.
• If we assume that space-time is curved, then we can theoretically explain
observed gravitation. Hence space-time is curved. If we assume
there was a Big Bang, then we can theoretically explain the observed
expansion of the Universe. Hence there was a Big Bang.
• If we assume there is a black hole at the center of a galaxy, then we
can theoretically explain the observed shape of a galaxy. Hence there
is a black hole in the center of a galaxy.
• If string theory would predict an observable phenomenon, it would
follow that matter consists of tiny vibrating strings.
• If we assume that the Earth rests on four invisible tortoises, then we
can theoretically explain why the Earth does not fall down. Hence the
Earth rests on four invisible tortoises.
• If we assume that CO2 is a critical greenhouse gas, then we can theoretically
explain observed global warming. Hence CO2 is a critical
greenhouse gas.
Do you see the possibly incorrect logic in these statements? If so, do you
see the potential danger of such possibly incorrect logic? Do you think such
possibly incorrect logic represents science or pseudo-science?
Notice that in all the above cases, the fact that a certain phenomenon is
observed, which can be theoretically explained from a certain assumption, is