Dr Faustus of Modern Physics - Department of Speech, Music and ...
Dr Faustus of Modern Physics - Department of Speech, Music and ...
Dr Faustus of Modern Physics - Department of Speech, Music and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
170 CHAPTER 37. QUANTUM MECHANICS: BOHR<br />
is the wave-particle dilemma... So unable is the good average physicist<br />
to believe that any sound person could refuse to accept the Copenhagen<br />
oracle... (Schrödinger in a letter to Synge 1959)<br />
• I no longer like to assume with Born that an individual process is “absolutely<br />
r<strong>and</strong>om”. I no longer believe that this conception accomplishes<br />
much. (Schrödinger in a letter to Wilhelm Wien in 1926)<br />
• It seems to me that the concept <strong>of</strong> probability is terribly mish<strong>and</strong>led<br />
these days. A probabilistic assertion presupposes the full reality <strong>of</strong> its<br />
subject. No reasonable person would express a conjecture as to whether<br />
Caesar rolled a five with his dice at the Rubicon. But the quantum<br />
mechanics people sometimes act as if probabilistic statements were to be<br />
applied just to events whose reality is vague. (Schr odinger to Einstein<br />
1950)<br />
• De Broglie, the creator <strong>of</strong> wave mechanics, accepted the results <strong>of</strong> quantum<br />
mechanics just as Schr odinger did, but not the statistical interpretation.<br />
(Born in the Born-Einstein Letters)<br />
• This inhibits us from accepting in a naive way a “blurred model” as an<br />
image <strong>of</strong> reality...There is a difference between a shaky or not sharply<br />
focussed photograph <strong>and</strong> a photograph <strong>of</strong> clouds <strong>and</strong> fog banks. (Schrödinger<br />
about the Copenhagen interpretation)<br />
• Bohr wants to complement away all difficulties.<br />
• Almost all other fellows do not look from the facts to the theory but<br />
from theory to the facts; they cannot extricate themselves from a once<br />
accepted conceptual net, but only flop about it in a grotesque way.<br />
• Bohr is completely convinced that any underst<strong>and</strong>ing in the usual sense<br />
<strong>of</strong> the word, is impossible. Therefore the conversation is almost immediately<br />
driven into philosophical questions, <strong>and</strong> soon you no longer<br />
know whether you really take the position he is attacking, or whether<br />
you really must attack the position that he is defending.<br />
• We cannot really change our forms <strong>of</strong> thought, <strong>and</strong> what we cannot<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> within these forms, we cannot underst<strong>and</strong> at all.