22.08.2013 Views

Dr Faustus of Modern Physics - Department of Speech, Music and ...

Dr Faustus of Modern Physics - Department of Speech, Music and ...

Dr Faustus of Modern Physics - Department of Speech, Music and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

170 CHAPTER 37. QUANTUM MECHANICS: BOHR<br />

is the wave-particle dilemma... So unable is the good average physicist<br />

to believe that any sound person could refuse to accept the Copenhagen<br />

oracle... (Schrödinger in a letter to Synge 1959)<br />

• I no longer like to assume with Born that an individual process is “absolutely<br />

r<strong>and</strong>om”. I no longer believe that this conception accomplishes<br />

much. (Schrödinger in a letter to Wilhelm Wien in 1926)<br />

• It seems to me that the concept <strong>of</strong> probability is terribly mish<strong>and</strong>led<br />

these days. A probabilistic assertion presupposes the full reality <strong>of</strong> its<br />

subject. No reasonable person would express a conjecture as to whether<br />

Caesar rolled a five with his dice at the Rubicon. But the quantum<br />

mechanics people sometimes act as if probabilistic statements were to be<br />

applied just to events whose reality is vague. (Schr odinger to Einstein<br />

1950)<br />

• De Broglie, the creator <strong>of</strong> wave mechanics, accepted the results <strong>of</strong> quantum<br />

mechanics just as Schr odinger did, but not the statistical interpretation.<br />

(Born in the Born-Einstein Letters)<br />

• This inhibits us from accepting in a naive way a “blurred model” as an<br />

image <strong>of</strong> reality...There is a difference between a shaky or not sharply<br />

focussed photograph <strong>and</strong> a photograph <strong>of</strong> clouds <strong>and</strong> fog banks. (Schrödinger<br />

about the Copenhagen interpretation)<br />

• Bohr wants to complement away all difficulties.<br />

• Almost all other fellows do not look from the facts to the theory but<br />

from theory to the facts; they cannot extricate themselves from a once<br />

accepted conceptual net, but only flop about it in a grotesque way.<br />

• Bohr is completely convinced that any underst<strong>and</strong>ing in the usual sense<br />

<strong>of</strong> the word, is impossible. Therefore the conversation is almost immediately<br />

driven into philosophical questions, <strong>and</strong> soon you no longer<br />

know whether you really take the position he is attacking, or whether<br />

you really must attack the position that he is defending.<br />

• We cannot really change our forms <strong>of</strong> thought, <strong>and</strong> what we cannot<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> within these forms, we cannot underst<strong>and</strong> at all.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!