23.08.2013 Views

The chiefs of Grant - Electric Scotland

The chiefs of Grant - Electric Scotland

The chiefs of Grant - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36G SIR JAMi;,S UHAXX OF GKANT, liAllO.NET. [1719-<br />

It may 1k_' <strong>of</strong>' iiit(M-c'.si to note liere a letter dated !Uli Jaimary 1747,<br />

but wliit-li ivl'ers to a ])re\ii)us date, tslimvlii^' that Sir James toaiit and liis<br />

family ^vele the patrons oi' a bursary ju tlie ("olIeL^e ot" St. Andrews. 'J'he<br />

v/ritev <strong>of</strong> the letter was the Itev. Thomas Tullidej'i, Prlrieijial <strong>of</strong> St.<br />

]\lary's Colle-v, St. Audi'ews. It is a^Mressed to tin- ,<br />

-v.<br />

ra^i.-k Ciraut,<br />

minister etween Sir .lames<br />

Gi'ant and the < 'olle^e, in 17' i. to some provisions in wliieh Sir James's<br />

agent timk exei'[iti(>n, but, on iinding they were similai' t(i these a^ieed to<br />

by the patron <strong>of</strong> the AVilkie bursaries, he eonsenteil to forward the contract<br />

to Sir James <strong>Grant</strong> to l)e completed. Throu-h some iiiadvertence the<br />

deed was not signed, and the rj'ineipal desires that it nn"ght now be<br />

arranged that the amnial income nn'ght be )vgularlv paid. It is not clear<br />

whether the sum named was the regular yearly ])a^•ment or not, but the<br />

Princijial owns recei[it (if .{.'lO, 4s. sterling, and discharges Mr. <strong>Grant</strong>'s<br />

bond fr(.im IMartinmas t744 to ]\[artlnnias ]745.<br />

<strong>The</strong> I'rincijial relates a curious ei)isode about the bursars. " Untill<br />

(he writes) 1 received your last it had quite escaped me that you had<br />

formerly complained <strong>of</strong> the ill usage <strong>of</strong> the Cirant bursars. Upon reccijit <strong>of</strong><br />

that I have cast en uj) yours <strong>of</strong> the itUh Jamiary 174G, and therein I lind<br />

you mention that they were apparently ill used at otu- table last session,<br />

but as they were not here to explain that ill usage to me, it had quite<br />

escaped mi'. ... It is very true that, since they came up this time, they<br />

complained to me that their beef at table was coarse ; but upon examining<br />

the undertaker (ct.mtractor), and the porter who then served them, I found<br />

it was <strong>of</strong> the ^ery same carcass that we were eating, and I assure you that<br />

I Jiave the tmdertaker's piromise that all the bursars shall eat <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

meat with the ^Masters, and v,'e reckon we never had better beef than we<br />

liave this year."'<br />

^Vhen J'rince Charles k^dward landed in <strong>Scotland</strong>. Sir James <strong>Grant</strong><br />

was in ]\bii-ayshire during one <strong>of</strong> his brief residences in the north. On<br />

learning the news, he at once went to Castle <strong>Grant</strong> and concerted with his<br />

son Lud(j\ ick what should lie done. Sir James himself, however, was<br />

ol.iliged to go to London to attend to his Parliamentary duties. Shortly<br />

' Original Letter at Castle <strong>Grant</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!