24.10.2012 Views

Hi-Res PDF - CRCnetBASE

Hi-Res PDF - CRCnetBASE

Hi-Res PDF - CRCnetBASE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

240<br />

and rollingstock gauges are clearly influenced by the British railway practice, as are braking<br />

systems. Wagon couplings on freight trains are predominately autocouplers with friction wedge<br />

type draft gear packages showing the North American influence. Privately owned railways on iron<br />

ore mines in the Australia’s North West show even moreNorth American influence with American<br />

style braking and larger structure and rollingstock gauges. Australia is also characterised bythree<br />

track gauges,alegacy of colonial and state governments before federation. The presence of narrow<br />

gauges of 1067 mm results in alarge fleet of rollingstock with adesign differing from standard<br />

gauge rollingstock in North America, Britain, and the southern states of Australia.<br />

This chapter is arranged to firstly give an overview of longitudinal train dynamics. The second<br />

section goes into considerable detail on approaches tomodelling longitudinal train dynamics. The<br />

mostspace is giventothe modellingofthe wagon connection model. Subsections are also devoted<br />

to modelling traction and dynamic braking systems, rolling resistance, air resistance, curving<br />

resistance, the effect of grades, and pneumatic braking. The subsection on pneumatic braking only<br />

provides an explanationofthe effect of pneumatic braking on train dynamics. Modelling pneumatic<br />

braking systems would require achapter in itself. Further more brief chapter sections are included<br />

on the interaction of longitudinal train dynamics with lateral/vertical wagon dynamics, crashworthiness,<br />

comfort and train management, and driving practices.<br />

A . A N O VERVIEW o F L ONGITUDINAL T RAIN D YNAMICS<br />

Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics<br />

Longitudinal train dynamicsisdefined as the motions of rollingstock vehicles in the direction of the<br />

track. It therefore includes the motion ofthe train as awhole and any relative motions between<br />

vehicles allowed due to the loosenessofthe connections between vehicles. In the railway industry,<br />

the relative motion between vehicles is known as“slack action” due to the correct understanding<br />

that thesemotions are primarily allowed by the free slack in wagon connections, coupling freeslack<br />

beingdefined as the free movement allowed by the sum of the clearances in the wagon connection.<br />

These clearances consist of clearances in the autocoupler knuckles and draft gear assembly pins.<br />

Cases of slack action are further classified in the Australian industry vernacular as run-ins and runouts.<br />

The case of arun-in describes the situation where vehicles are progressively impacting each<br />

otherasthe train compresses. The case of arun-out describes the opposite situation where vehicles<br />

are reaching the extended extremeofconnection free slack as the train stretches.Longitudinal train<br />

dynamics therefore has implications for passenger comfort, vehicle stability, rollingstock design,<br />

and rollingstock metal fatigue.<br />

The study and understanding of longitudinal train dynamics was probably firstly motivated by<br />

the desire to reducelongitudinal oscillationsinpassenger trains and in so doing improve the general<br />

comfort of passengers. The practice of power braking, that being keeping power applied with<br />

minimum air braking, is still practiced widely in Australia on passenger trains. Power braking is<br />

also used on partly loaded mixed freight trains to keep the train stretched during braking and when<br />

operating on undulating track. In the Australian context,the studyoflongitudinal train dynamics is<br />

evidenced in technical papers coinciding with the development of heavy haul unit trains for the<br />

transport ofcoal and iron ore. Measurement and simulation of in-train forces on such trains in the<br />

Queensland coal haulage was reported by Duncan and Webb. 1 Moving to trains of double existing<br />

length was reported at the same time in New South Wales in apaper by Jolly and Sismey. 2 Interest<br />

was also evident in South Africa with the publication of apaper focused on train handling<br />

techniques on the Richards Bay Line. 3 The research was driven primarily by the occurrences of<br />

fatigue cracking and tensile failures in autocouplers. From these studies 1–3 an understanding of<br />

the force magnitudes and an awareness of the need to limit these forces with appropriate driving<br />

strategies was developed. During these developments, the first measurement of in-train forces in<br />

long trains utilising distributed locomotive placement were completed. An important outcome<br />

was that athird type of in-train force behaviour was identified. Prior to these studies in-forces<br />

were divided into two types, namely, steady forces and impact forces. Steady in-train forces are<br />

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!