24.10.2012 Views

Hi-Res PDF - CRCnetBASE

Hi-Res PDF - CRCnetBASE

Hi-Res PDF - CRCnetBASE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Longitudinal Train Dynamics 273<br />

<strong>Res</strong>istance, N/tonne<br />

individual vehicle mass i ,kg; m t is the total train mass, kg; F crj is the curving resistance for curve j<br />

in Newtons; F pri is the propulsion resistance for vehicle i in Newtons; q is the number of vehicles;<br />

and r is the number of curves.<br />

Unless the track is extremely flat and signalling conditions particularly favourable, the energy<br />

used will be much larger than given bythe above equation. However, it is auseful equation in<br />

determining how much scope exists for improved system design and practice. It is illustrative to<br />

consider asimple example of a2000tonne freight train with arunning speed of 80 km/h. The work<br />

carried out to bring the train to speed, represented in Equation 9.25, by the kinetic energy term, is<br />

lost every time the train must be stopped and partly lost by any brake application. The energy loss<br />

per train stop in terms of other parameters in the equation are given inTable 9.3.<br />

What can be seen at aglance from Table 9.3 is the very high cost of stop starts compared to<br />

other parameters. Air resistance becomes more significant for higherrunning speeds. <strong>Hi</strong>gh densities<br />

of tight curves can also add considerablecosts. It shouldbenoted that this analysisdoes not include<br />

the additional costs in rail wear or speed restriction also added by curves.<br />

5. Distributed Power Configurations<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140<br />

Velocity, kph<br />

FIGURE 9.47 Comparative effects of resistances to motion.<br />

Modified Davis Car<br />

Factor =0.85<br />

Rolling stockTerm<br />

Flanging FactorTerm<br />

Air <strong>Res</strong>istanceTerm<br />

Curve R=200 m<br />

Curve R= 400 m<br />

Curve R=800 m<br />

0.25 %Grade<br />

Perhaps alandmark paper describing the operation of remote controlled locomotives was that of<br />

Parker, 22 referred to by Van Der Meulen. 3 The paper details the introduction of remote controlled<br />

locomotives to Canadian Pacific. The paper is comprehensive in its description of the equipment<br />

used, but, most importantly, it examines the issues concerning remote locomotive placement and<br />

includes operational case studies. Parker notes that the usual placement of the remote locomotives<br />

is at the position two thirds alongthe train. For operation on severe grades it was recommended that<br />

TABLE 9.3<br />

Energy Losses Equivalent to One Train Stop for aTrain Running at 80 km/h<br />

Energy Parameter Equivalent Loss Units<br />

Gravitational potential energy (second term<br />

Equation 9.25)<br />

, 25 Metres of altitude<br />

Curving resistance (third term Equation 9.25) , 16 Kilometres ofresistance due to<br />

curvature of400 mradius<br />

Propulsion resistance (fourth term Equation 9.25) , 18 Kilometres ofpropulsion resistance<br />

Air resistance (Part of propulsion resistance) , 38 Kilometres ofair resistance<br />

© 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!