The Vajracchedikā-sūtra with gāthās compiled by Master Fu - Evertype

U 3344 (T III TV 49.502)
/Through that the defiled [actions] will be complete; /Until the end [human beings and gods will]
not differ [each other(?)] / Holding [four lines gāthā] of this doctrine, 136 / [will achieve] the blessed
state of being a Buddha 137 [together with Noble Persons (?)], / If one wishes to enter the
unconditioned [sea],
the boat which came later […]
Ninth [part:]
Again [the Buddha, the god of gods, deigned to say] to Subhūti, ‘What do you think? [Could a
srotāpanna think,] ‘I have attained the fruit of a srotāpanna?’ [Subhūti said, ‘No, my Lord. If one asks],
‘Why?’ [Srotāpanna …] As for the name of [srotāpanna], it is a non-self (anātman) doctrine, because it
has descended down [from the non-self doctrine], it does not descend down [from the doctrines]
form, [sound, smell, taste and touch]. The form, [sound, smell, taste and touch…]
Mainz 124 fragment H recto + U 2036 (T) recto
[…] without […] srotāpanna […] [Subhūti, what do you think, [could] a sakṛadāgāmin [think] like this, ‘I
have attained the fruit of sakṛadāgāmin?’ [Subhūti] said, ‘No, my Lord. If one asks, ‘Why?’
Sakṛadāgāmin means ‘once-returner. 138 In truth, non-self (anātman) […]
U 736 (T II S 32a) recto + U 3559
[…] comes back, and therefore it is [called] sakṛadāgāmin. Subhūti, could an anāgāmin think like this,
‘I have attained the fruit of an anāgāmin.’ Su[bhūti] said, ‘No, my Lord. If one asks, ‘Why?’ Anāgāmin
means ‘[never-return]er’. Being so, in truth, being non-self (anātman) and non-ego, 139 again [went
beyond] desire and does not return. Therefore, it is called anāgāmin’.
Now [tells] its gāthā. 140
136
The Original Old Uyghur text has bo nomug, it is not clear here the suffix –(X)g stands for genitive or
accusative; if it has accusative reading, the whole sentence might be translated ‘holding this doctrine, (it four
gāthās).
137 Original Old Uyghur text has burhan kutı, it translates here Chin. 良 緣 liangyuan ‘good reason’.
138
Lit. once [goes away and comes back].
139 The original Old Uyghur text displays m(ä)nsiz m(ä)ningsiz lit. none-self and none of mine. The difference
between m(ä)nsiz and m(ä)ningsiz in this place is not clear. The Chinese text has no parallel expression to both
of them.
140 The known versions of the Chinese texts do not contain gāthā in this place.