Transactions
Transactions
Transactions
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
474 TRANSACTIONS OF T H E A.S.M.E. AUGUST, 1941<br />
on oxidation and reduction of slag particles under controlled<br />
conditions support our viewpoint of 1934. Reduction of Fe2Oa<br />
to FeO can occur relatively rapidly, as far as the change is due to<br />
increase of temperature only, but less rapidly by the action of a<br />
reducing gas or carbon. Reoxidation is relatively slow; the absorption<br />
of oxygen must start at the surface of a particle of slag<br />
and work inward; thus, the time required to oxidize will increase<br />
rapidly with the size of the particles. We do not consider it<br />
likely that the actions of reduction and reoxidation can occur in<br />
the few seconds required for the passage of the ash through the<br />
furnace.<br />
The foregoing and Fig. 12, of reference (5) of this paper, explain<br />
why the authors found ash having 90 ferric percentage in<br />
the rear of the furnace, whereas, in our tests the ferric percentages<br />
were lower for slags that reached equilibrium in air at higher<br />
temperatures.<br />
The paper raises a question on the dependability of the chemical<br />
analyses for total iron and iron forms in slags. The question<br />
was referred to W. A. Selvig, under whose direction our many<br />
analyses were made; his report follows:<br />
“No method for the determination of iron forms in materials<br />
such as slags is entirely satisfactory. All methods are empirical<br />
and subject to small errors, the extent of which it is difficult to<br />
determine exactly. The method used by the Bureau is that of<br />
the Bureau of Mines Technical Paper 8, Methods of Analyzing<br />
Coal and Coke.<br />
“By this method total iron can be determined accurately and<br />
is calculated to Fe20 3.<br />
“Metallic iron is determined by digesting the slag with mercuric-chloride<br />
solution. Ferrous iron plus metallic iron are determined<br />
by digesting a portion of slag with dilute sulphuric<br />
acid under specified conditions, whereby these two forms are obtained<br />
in solution, and this soluble iron determined. This iron<br />
calculated to FeO minus the FeO equivalent of the metallic iron<br />
represents the ferrous oxide in the slag.<br />
“The ferric oxide in the slag is obtained by subtracting the<br />
Fe2Oj equivalent of the ferrous oxide and the metallic iron from<br />
the total equivalent Fe20 8 previously found.”<br />
The authors’ definition of their term “per cent oxidation” is<br />
the same as ours for “ferric percentage,” which we define as the<br />
“ratio of ferric iron to total iron, expressed as a percentage.”<br />
We question whether the term used by the authors has as definite<br />
a meaning because both the ferrous and ferric states represent<br />
per cent oxidation of the iron.<br />
The authors refer to “stickiness” several times. This is an<br />
interesting and also—we have found—a complex property. It<br />
would be a blessing if slags would not stick to boiler tubes, but<br />
independent of whether or not data will be of immediate use we<br />
should have some understanding of factors involved in sticking.<br />
A definition is required. Stickiness is more than “wetting;”<br />
a rod dipped in water will be wetted but one would not call water<br />
sticky. A rod pressed into tar, heated so that it is just soft, will<br />
stick, but heat the tar enough, and it will be so liquid that it<br />
would no longer be sticky. Thus, stickiness involves some measure<br />
of “force to separate” and, in general, as a slag is heated<br />
there will be a range of temperature over which it could be called<br />
sticky. However, it is possible that measures of ranges of wetting<br />
may also be required.<br />
Two surfaces are always involved in sticking; so far our studies<br />
have been limited to the sticking of slag to slag, both surfaces<br />
being at the same temperature. We have records of the initial<br />
temperature of sticking of over 400 slags, included in the report<br />
of reference (4) of the paper. Most slags had one sticky range;<br />
others would have two, that is, the stickiness disappeared as the<br />
temperature was increased and then reappeared. Others seemed<br />
to have no sticky temperature.<br />
A more intensive study of a few slags and glasses showed that<br />
the stickiness depended upon the liquid phase present in the slag,<br />
its quantity, and its viscosity; also, the appearance of stickiness<br />
was related to the rate of heating and cooling. The initial sticky<br />
temperature of slag to slag tended to equal or be less than the<br />
cone initial temperature of the premelted ash, but there was no<br />
definite relationship to chemical composition.<br />
Studies of the stickiness of slags to other material are included<br />
in our plans for the future. We have recognized that deposits on<br />
metal tubes may materially affect the sticking of slags. Condensation<br />
of alkalies from their vapors can be one form of deposit<br />
and, under special fuel-bed conditions, silica may be<br />
deposited as the result of oxidation of silicon in the gaseous phase.<br />
We have studied high-iron black deposits, such as the author<br />
found on the probe. One sample had 53 per cent equivalent<br />
Fe20 3, twice the CaO of the coal ash, and a somewhat higher<br />
silica-alumina ratio; the ferric percentage was 78. A microscopic<br />
examination showed that it was composed of particles of<br />
fly ash, lightly fused together. The conclusion was that those<br />
particles having high iron and lime stuck to the tube more readily<br />
because they were stickier than the refractory particles.<br />
The intensive studies on pulverized-coal furnaces which Mr.<br />
Bailey has organized should be extended to other types of furnaces,<br />
to producers, and to kilns, in the attempt to correlate the<br />
life history and forms of the ash more definitely with its composition<br />
and properties. A few complete studies should give patterns<br />
for reference in each class of burning. The probe and other<br />
innovations in methods of tests devised by the authors will be<br />
valuable tools in such investigations.<br />
However, before such studies are undertaken there must be<br />
more complete knowledge of the absolute properties of the ash<br />
than is given by even the three cone-fusion temperatures. The<br />
cone values are at best related to arbitrarily fixed conditions of<br />
test, and vary with changes in the conditions. Premelting the<br />
ash and making up a cone can change the initial deformation<br />
temperature as much as 300 F from that of the original ash.<br />
Which is the correct value to use? Ashes have definite physical<br />
properties, such as viscosity and surface tension, which are exactly,<br />
or very closely, defined by the chemical composition. To<br />
have definite meaning, the cone temperatures must be comparative<br />
measures of the physical properties; therefore, it is necessary<br />
to determine whether such relations exist and can be used, or<br />
whether the values for the primary physical properties should<br />
supplement the more easily obtained cone-fusion values.<br />
E. B. P o w e l l . 16 The authors devote the greater part of their<br />
comment to the influence of atmosphere on the properties of coal<br />
ash as deposited in different parts of the furnace and on heatabsorbing<br />
surfaces. In this they point out the effect of the<br />
combustion stage of the individual particle in determining the<br />
surrounding atmosphere and the importance of fineness of pulverization<br />
as a factor in determining the combustion stage of the<br />
particle in any part of the furnace or path of the combustion<br />
products. These observations are of great value. Apparently,<br />
however, the primary purpose of the paper is to urge further<br />
study of the ash-fusion determination and the inclusion in the<br />
determination of the effect of an oxidizing atmosphere. The<br />
writer is in hearty agreement with the authors in this plea. He<br />
would add, however, that in the further study special attention<br />
should be given to definition of the atmosphere. The authors<br />
themselves suggest as a possible explanation of differences obtained<br />
in determinations made in their own and the Bureau of<br />
Mines laboratories, differences in degree of reducing and oxidizing<br />
properties of the respective furnace atmospheres. A further<br />
16 Consulting Engineer, Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation,<br />
Boston, Mass. Mem. A.S.M.E.