24.11.2013 Views

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

520 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. AUGUST, 1941<br />

same tube, aluminum brass. Section 14 showed no measurable<br />

wall reduction, while section 27 showed roughly a 25 per cent decrease<br />

at the point of maximum corrosion.<br />

Aluminum brass was found to have performed about equally<br />

well in the impingement test, whether it was in the hard-drawn or<br />

in the annealed condition. Of the aluminum brasses in groups<br />

1 and 2 , good corrosion resistance, three are annealed and two<br />

are hard-drawn. In group 5, showing roughly a 25 per cent reduction<br />

in wall thickness by pitting, two of the aluminum brasses<br />

were hard-drawn and one was annealed. In the same way, the<br />

tube materials of the individual manufacturers showed no definite<br />

tendencies consistently favoring annealed or hard-drawn aluminum<br />

brass.<br />

Conclusions that may be drawn from the results of the impingement<br />

tests are:<br />

1 Under the conditions set up in the test procedure, aluminum<br />

brass, from a general average standpoint, is superior to all other<br />

materials.<br />

2 The resistance of the aluminum brass to impingement corrosion<br />

is of the same order, whether in the hard-drawn or the<br />

annealed condition.<br />

3 Admiralty metal, from a general average standpoint, is<br />

inferior to all of the other materials.<br />

4 The black-skin treatment of the admiralty metal is not effective<br />

in increasing the resistance of the metal to impingement<br />

corrosion.<br />

5 Maximum resistance to impingement corrosion is not dependent<br />

upon any single factor, but embodies the combined effects<br />

of composition and manufacturing procedure.<br />

C o n d e n s e s T ests<br />

The condenser-corrosion tests were made on a miniature condenser<br />

which is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 1. Four different<br />

grades of tubes were placed in the condenser, namely, tubes of<br />

the type known as aluminum brass, cupronickel, admiralty, and<br />

one bronze tube consisting of 8 8 per cent copper, 4 per cent zinc,<br />

4 per cent tin, and 4 per cent lead. The water velocity was 7<br />

fps. The tubes were heated from the blowdown system of a 400-<br />

pound boiler. The temperature of the condensing water taken<br />

from the river, ranged from 35 F to 80 F. The test was of approximately<br />

2 2 months’ duration with but one serious interruption<br />

which was for a period of about one month.<br />

On the completion of the test run, the tubes were removed from<br />

the condenser and examined for the purpose of determining the<br />

extent to which corrosion had taken place.<br />

As it appeared desirable to run certain tests on the tubes from<br />

the condenser for comparison with the tube material which had<br />

not been subjected to the experimental run, it was not feasible<br />

to split the tubes longitudinally. In consequence, sections of<br />

each tube approximately one inch in length and from five different<br />

positions were obtained. This procedure not only made it possible<br />

to obtain a reasonable accurate survey of the extent of the<br />

corrosion, but also made it possible for material to be secured for<br />

the mercurous-nitrate and the various physical tests. The locations<br />

of these various sections are shown in the upper diagram in<br />

Fig. 2.<br />

Corrosum-Besistance Condenser Test. The one-inch sections<br />

were examined under a low-power binocular to determine the<br />

nature and extent of the corrosion. Using the arbitrary arrangement<br />

scheme followed for the impingement-test rating, a comparison<br />

was made, first of the sections within any tube, and then<br />

on the basis of sections from corresponding positions in all tubes.<br />

As before, minimum corrosion was rated as 1 and maximum as 9.<br />

Depth of penetration of attack, rather than extent to which attack<br />

was general, was used as a basis for the ratings. Thus, a<br />

single pit of appreciable depth would rate the corrosion resistance<br />

lower than a general attack of little penetration. Micrometer<br />

readings of wall thickness, and also metallographic measurements,<br />

were made where any question existed as to the extent of a general<br />

corrosion attack. Examination was also made of the ends of the<br />

adjoining sections in checking final ratings. Inasmuch as the<br />

end sections A and F always showed lower degrees of corrosion<br />

than the sections from any of the other positions, they were eliminated<br />

in the final ratings and do not appear in any of the tabulations.<br />

Table 8 and the upper-rating diagram in Fig. 2 give the results.<br />

Loss-irtr-Weight Condenser Test. An analysis of the extent of<br />

the corrosion was also made on six-inch center sections from each<br />

of the tubes in question. The results are given in Table 9 and<br />

in Fig. 2.<br />

C o rrosion-R e sista n c e C o m b in ed R a tin g<br />

As a means of correlating the various ratings made on the<br />

basis of the results of the impingement test and the experimental<br />

condenser test, a combined rating was set up. The ratings determined<br />

by the impingement test have been given a rating of 1 ;<br />

the ratings from the loss of weight on the six-inch sections, a rating<br />

of 1 ; and the ratings from the corrosion-resistance condenser<br />

TABLE 8 EXPERIMENTAL CONDENSER TEST—RATED ON<br />

BASIS MAXIMUM CORROSION SHOWN AT ANY SECTION<br />

Rating Tube Material Condition<br />

1<br />

8 A1 brass Annealed<br />

6 A1 brass Hard-drawn<br />

2<br />

2 A1 brass Hard-drawn; end annealed<br />

5 A1 brass Annealed<br />

12 A1 brass Hard-drawn; relief anneal<br />

3<br />

7 A1 brass Hard-drawn<br />

10 A1 brass Annealed; Snead E<br />

1 A1 brass Hard-drawn<br />

14 A1 brass Hard-drawn<br />

27 A1 brass Hard-drawn<br />

4<br />

15 A\ brass Annealed<br />

4 Al brass Annealed<br />

9 Al brass Hard-drawn<br />

19 Cupronickel Hard-drawn; end annealed<br />

5<br />

13 Al brass Annealed<br />

6<br />

(23 Admiralty Annealed; black skin<br />

\26 Cuproniokel Annealed<br />

i20 Admiralty Annealed<br />

7<br />

21 Admiralty Annealed<br />

22 Admiralty Annealed<br />

8<br />

25 Admiralty Relief annealed; end annealed<br />

(18 Cupronickel Annealed<br />

9<br />

\25 Admiralty Annealed<br />

11 Al brass Annealed<br />

(<br />

17 Cupronickel Annealed<br />

30 Bronze Hard-drawn<br />

TABLE 9 WEIGHT LOSS IN PER CENT IN EXPERIMENTAL<br />

CONDENSER-TUBE TEST<br />

MIDDLE<br />

BASED<br />

OF<br />

ON<br />

TUBE<br />

6-INCH SECTION FROM<br />

Loss,<br />

Rating per cent Tube Material Condition<br />

i<br />

fl.O 18 Cupronickel<br />

.1.2 8 Aluminum brass Annealed<br />

/1.5<br />

2 7 Aluminum brass Hard-drawn<br />

,1.6 1 Aluminum brass Hard-drawn<br />

2.2 6 Aluminum brass Hard-drawn<br />

2.2<br />

3 14 Aluminum brass Hard-drawn<br />

2.3 15 Aluminum brass Annealed<br />

2.3 27 Aluminnm brass Hard-drawn<br />

2.6 2 Aluminum brass Hard-drawn; end annealed<br />

4 2.6 10 Aluminum brass Annealed<br />

2.9 5 Aluminum brass Annealed<br />

2.9 12' Aluminum brass Relief and end annealed<br />

3.0 13 Aluminum brass Annealed<br />

5 3.4 4 Aluminum brass Annealed<br />

4.2 9 Aluminum brass Hard-drawn<br />

5.9 19 Cupronickel Hard-drawn; end annealed<br />

6 7.3 24 Admiralty Relief annealed; end annealed*.<br />

7.5 21 Admiralty Annealed<br />

8.1 17 Cupronickel Annealed; Snead A<br />

7 9.2 20 Admiralty Annealed<br />

9.7 26 Cupronickel Annealed<br />

J10.6 22 Admiralty Annealed<br />

8<br />

\11.5 23 Admiralty Annealed; blaek skin<br />

[12.8 11 Admiralty Annealed<br />

9 415.3 25 Admiralty Annealed<br />

16.7 30 Bronze Hard-drawn

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!