24.11.2013 Views

Transactions

Transactions

Transactions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

512 TRANSACTIONS OF TH E A.S.M.E. AUGUST, 1941<br />

creased steam output, would call for increased heat input to the<br />

saturated furnace. In order to maintain a constant total steam<br />

temperature, this might necessitate reducing the heat input to<br />

the superheater furnace. An explanation as to just how this is<br />

accomplished without a somewhat complicated system of automatic<br />

control would be of interest. The writer would further ask<br />

what means are employed to advise the operator when the rate of<br />

firing in the superheater furnace to produce a certain steam<br />

temperature has become unduly high for that particular load<br />

and prompts him to use the radiant-superheater soot blowers<br />

to remove accumulated ash and possible clinker from these surfaces.<br />

The question of completely bare waterwall tubes or armor-clad<br />

surfaces in furnaces subjected to high heat inputs with consequent<br />

high furnace temperatures is still debatable. An increase<br />

in mean furnace temperature from 2000 F to 2500 F would increase<br />

the volume of the products of combustion in the ratio of<br />

1 to 1.17 or 17 per cent and the velocity head approximately<br />

0.037 in. water gage. Since complete combustion of a pulverized-coal<br />

particle depends largely upon rapid and intimate contact<br />

with oxygen, viz., turbulence, the particle size, volatile content,<br />

etc., and also temperature to a lesser extent, the increase in<br />

the time element in the furnace, which is due to even a large<br />

increase in furnace temperature would not materially affect the<br />

completeness of combustion of the particle.<br />

A u t h o r s ’ C l o s u r e<br />

Mr. Julsrud asks how the temperature of the steam, from the<br />

large boiler described in the paper is controlled.<br />

The temperature of the steam is controlled automatically by a<br />

temperature controller that operates so as to vary the loading<br />

pressure on the fuel and air controllers for the saturated and<br />

superheater furnaces in accordance with the requirements. An<br />

increase in steam output is automatically met by an increase in<br />

heat input to both furnaces. Then if the steam temperature is<br />

low the loading pressure on the fuel controller regulating the<br />

fuel to the superheater furnace is increased which increases<br />

the heat input to the superheater furnace. This will increase the<br />

steam pressure since the total heat input is now more than the demand<br />

so the master pressure controller acts to reduce the input<br />

to both furnaces. This action is maintained until the steam temperature<br />

is as required. The opposite takes place if the steam<br />

temperature is high following a change in load.<br />

Differential pressure gages are provided to indicate to the<br />

operators the extent by which the flow of fuel to one furnace exceeds<br />

that to the other furnace. At full load both furnaces are<br />

fired equally. From experience the operator knows about how<br />

much difference in differential there should be for the designed<br />

steam temperature at various loads. When the operating gages<br />

indicate too great a difference from the normal in fuel flow to<br />

the superheater furnace he has an indication that the radiant<br />

superheater needs cleaning. Another indication is obtained from<br />

the position indicators of the fuel controllers. In addition the<br />

desirability of cleaning the radiant superheater may be made by<br />

inspection.<br />

Mr. Julsrud also discusses the effect of increasing the mean<br />

temperature of the gases in the furnace from 2000 to 2500 F on<br />

burning the coal. This increase in temperature would increase<br />

the specific volume of the gases by 20 per cent and accordingly<br />

would cause the gases at the lower temperature to take 20 per<br />

cent longer to pass through the furnace, which would thus give<br />

the coal 20 per cent longer time in which to bum. He appears<br />

to infer that since the velocity pressure will be higher at the higher<br />

temperature, the turbulence will be greater. But velocity pressure<br />

unless taken as a ratio of the pressure gradient is not a<br />

measure of turbulence. Actually, since the viscosity at 2500 F<br />

is 11 per cent greater than it is at 2000 F the turbulence presumably<br />

is less at the higher temperature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!