Waste reduction final report -4 - Test Input

More documents

Recommendations

Info

170409 170503 170504 170505 170506 170507 170508 170601 170603 170604 Metal waste, contaminated by dangerous materials Earth and rocks, including dangerous materials Earth and rocks, excluding those listed in 17 05 03 Excavated material, including dangerous materials Excavated material, excluding those listed in 17 05 05 Track ballast, including dangerous materials Track ballast, excluding those listed in 17 05 07 Insulating material, including asbestos Other insulating material, existing of dangerous materials or including such materials Insulating materials, excluding those listed in 17 06 01 and 17 06 03 0.2 - 0.2 0.0 1 097.8 118.0 913.8 66.0 14 416.4 682.5 13 698.0 35.9 18.1 0.1 18.0 - 167.1 0.6 166.5 - 24.2 0.8 21.7 1.8 38.1 21.4 16.7 - 14.8 0.2 4.8 9.8 68.9 1.9 65.9 1.1 33.7 2.2 31.5 - 170605 Asbestos construction materials 354.5 3.7 304.4 46.4 170801 Construction materials of cement, contaminated by dangerous materials 0.8 - 0.8 - 170802 170901 170902 Construction materials of cement, excluding those listed in 17 08 01 Construction and demolition waste, including quicksilver Construction and demolition waste, including PCB (e.g. sealing compound, flooring, insulating glazing, condenser with PBC, flooring with resin 117.8 0.1 113.4 4.3 0.1 - 0.1 - 3.6 0.0 3.0 0.6 170903 Other construction and demolition waste (including mixed waste), including dangerous materials 22.0 12.2 6.4 3.4 170904 Mixed construction and demolition waste, excluding those listed in 17 09 01, 17 09 02 and 17 09 03 342.9 12.9 329.9 0.0 23
The table below lists the total construction and demolition waste production and the amount of recycled waste in 2000 and 2004. Waste type Total construction and demolition waste production Total construction and demolition waste production Amount of waste recycled [million tonnes] [%] [million tonnes] Year 2000 2004 (2004) (2004) Demolition waste 52.1 50.5 25.2% 31.1 Road scarification 16.6 19.7 9.8% 18.4 Construction waste 4.3 1.9 0.9% 0.1 Cement - 0.3 0.2% - Total (without excavation) 73.0 72.4 36.1% 49.6 Waste from excavation ? 128.3 63.9% 9.1 Total ? 200.7 100% 58.7 2. Policies, strategies and legislation Negotiated Agreement of the ARGE KWTB Regarding the treatment of construction and demolition (C&D) waste the ARGE KWTB (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Kreislaufwirtschaftsträger Bau − Construction Recycling and Waste Management Industry Working Group), a consortium of construction industry trade associations, e.g. The Central Association of the German Construction Industry (ZFB Zentralverband des deutschen Baugewerbes – ZFB’) and Confederation of Recycling Construction Materials (‘Bundesvereinigung Recycling-Baustoffe – BRB‘), entered into a voluntary commitment with the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, to achieve a 50% reduction in the amount of landfilled C&D waste in Germany. In 2005 the construction industry achieved their 10-year voluntary commitment for the 5th time with a long term recycling quota of 70.1% and a long term recovery quota of 88.7%. Waste Avoidance, Recovery and Avoidance Act On October 7th, 1996 the Waste Avoidance, Recovery and Disposal Act (Kreislaufwirtschafts- und Abfallgesetz - KrW-/AbfG) came into force. The Act is strongly connected to the European guidelines 75/442/EWG. It contains the basic principles of German waste management and closed-loop recycling strategies. The Act assigns a hierarchy for waste prevention: • avoidance of waste is better than the recycling of waste, • waste that cannot be prevented should be recovered, and • landfill disposal of waste is only allowed when neither prevention nor recovery is feasible or economically reasonable. 24
Page 1 and 2: Publication 364 W115 - Construction
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Foreword 3 Introd
Page 6 and 7: Introduction This report has been p
Page 8 and 9: • Benchmarks for waste production
Page 10 and 11: Canada (with a focus on Ontario) Co
Page 12 and 13: Canada 8,961,583 9,238,376 16,265,1
Page 14 and 15: Table 5: Projected tonnage of CRD w
Page 16 and 17: • conduct an audit of the waste t
Page 18 and 19: Standard that is now a requirement
Page 20 and 21: while reducing the amount of useful
Page 22 and 23: components. However, recycling of s
Page 26 and 27: Organic waste Since the Disposal Ac
Page 28 and 29: Israel Contributed by: Gil Peled -
Page 30 and 31: includes: • Stopping the illegal
Page 32 and 33: 4. Guidance documents/ reports link
Page 34 and 35: The Plan includes: • Prevention b
Page 36 and 37: The Jaffa Slope was a landfill on t
Page 38 and 39: One of the first community gardens
Page 40 and 41: The amount of recycled and landfill
Page 42 and 43: Roles and responsibilities Manufact
Page 44 and 45: est outcome. This includes applying
Page 47 and 48: (1) Resource consumption. Upper: Be
Page 49 and 50: Norway Contributed by: Anne Sigrid
Page 51 and 52: 2. Policies, strategies and legisla
Page 53 and 54: Singapore Contributed by: Dr Edward
Page 55 and 56: Figure 2 - Composition of Demolitio
Page 57 and 58: Figure 4 - Concrete Usage Index (CU
Page 59 and 60: Figure 5: Use of Incineration Botto
Page 61 and 62: STRATEGIC THRUST 5: Setting minimum
Page 63 and 64: Table 2(a) - Framework and Point Al
Page 65 and 66: 4. Guidance documents/ reports link
Page 67 and 68: GREEN PRACTICES (50%) GREEN PRACTIC
Page 69 and 70: vehicles and machinery to reduce em
Page 71 and 72: Practices methods/ machines to addr
Page 73 and 74: 5. Exemplars, case studies The foll
Page 75 and 76:
installation of photocell sensors a
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 2: Treatment of waste collec
Page 79 and 80:
• registration of buildings with
Page 81 and 82:
The GDP (PPP) 22 of Switzerland is
Page 83 and 84:
are chosen according to the buildin
Page 85 and 86:
Asphalt 0.3 Wood 0.5 Plastics 0.5 C
Page 87 and 88:
Even if other materials than the ab
Page 89 and 90:
In this chapter, an overview on Swi
Page 91 and 92:
engineering, the aim of the revisio
Page 93 and 94:
Discussion Many legal texts and imp
Page 95 and 96:
Figure 7: Annual outputs of waste m
Page 97 and 98:
Table 3: Construction waste materia
Page 99:
All plants in Switzerland currently
Page 102 and 103:
Table 6: Sales volumes of recycling
Page 104 and 105:
study mentioned before claims that
Page 106 and 107:
view, avoidance of landfill fees br
Page 108 and 109:
viewpoint of sustainable developmen
Page 110 and 111:
The Association of Operators of Swi
Page 112 and 113:
- www.bauteilnetz.ch, which is run
Page 114 and 115:
Discussion Treatment of the main co
Page 116 and 117:
References Internet: accessed 06/12
Page 118 and 119:
43) KIWE-Ca 2009. Düngkalkprodukte
Page 120 and 121:
Turkey Contributed by: Soofia Tahir
Page 122 and 123:
5. Exemplars, case studies Not avai
Page 124 and 125:
Figure 2 illustrates this shift tow
Page 126 and 127:
Table 1: Waste Benchmark Data by Pr
Page 128 and 129:
3. Policies, strategies and legisla
Page 130 and 131:
Sustainable Construction Task Group
Page 132 and 133:
BeAware The Technology Strategy Boa
Page 134 and 135:
Percent 43% 57% 100% Table 3 Estima
Page 136 and 137:
2. Total waste generated in 2000 Po
Page 138 and 139:
(SOURCE: http://www.portlandonline.
Page 140 and 141:
7. The Sustainable Development Poli
Page 142 and 143:
of waste materials. The 2003 final
Page 144 and 145:
Recycling Economic Worksheet sample
Page 146 and 147:
Wood/ Green Waste Asphaltic Concret
Page 148 and 149:
FY 2001 / 2002 FY 2002 / 2003 Dispo
Page 150 and 151:
Discussion Contributed by: Gilli Ho
Page 152 and 153:
essentially links concrete use to f
Page 154 and 155:
Appendices 153
Page 156 and 157:
. the surplus to be used to cover l
Page 158 and 159:
Regulation on encumbrances on the s
Page 160 and 161:
Standard Title (Year) (2001) constr
Page 162 and 163:
Standards on use of construction bu
Page 164 and 165:
CIB Mission we focus on: Constructi
Page 166 and 167:
DISCLAIMER All rights reserved. No
show all

Waste reduction final report -4 - Test Input

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?