Mmushi T MSc (Microbiology).pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fig. 3.3. Fig. 3.4. Fig. 3.5. Fig. 3.6. Fig. 3.7. Fig. 3.8. Fig. 3.9. Chromatograms of crude extracts developed in solvent systems (BEA, EMW and CEF) and sprayed with vanillin-sulphuric acid to indicate separated compounds extracted with dichloromethane, hexane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant............................... 46 Chromatograms of crude extracts developed in solvent systems (BEA, EMW and CEF) and sprayed with vanillin-sulphuric acid to indicate separated compounds extracted with dichloromethane, hexane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant............................... 47 Chromatograms of crude extracts developed in solvent systems (BEA, EMW and CEF) and sprayed with vanillin-sulphuric acid to indicate separated compounds extracted with dichloromethane, hexane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant............................... 48 Chromatograms of crude extracts developed in solvent systems (BEA, EMW and CEF) and sprayed with vanillin-sulphuric acid to indicate separated compounds extracted with dichloromethane, hexane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant............................... 49 Chromatograms of crude extracts developed in solvent systems (BEA, EMW and CEF) and sprayed with 0.2% DPPH to indicate antioxidant compounds extracted with dichloromethane, hexane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant...................................... 50 Chromatograms of crude extracts developed in solvent systems (BEA, EMW and CEF) and sprayed with 0.2% DPPH to indicate antioxidant compounds extracted with dichloromethane, hexane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant...................................... 51 Chromatograms of crude extracts developed in solvent systems (BEA, EMW and CEF) and sprayed with 0.2% DPPH to indicate antioxidant compounds extracted with dichloromethane, hexane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant...................................... 52 xii
Fig. 3.10. Fig. 3.11. Fig. 3.12. Fig. 3.13. Fig. 3.14. Fig. 3.15. Fig. 3.16 Fig. 3.17. Fig. 3.18 Fig. 3.19. Chromatograms of crude extracts developed in solvent systems (BEA, EMW and CEF) and sprayed with 0.2% DPPH to indicate antioxidant compounds extracted with dichloromethane, hexane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant...................................... 53 Chromatograms of crude extracts developed in solvent systems (BEA, EMW and CEF) and sprayed with 0.2% DPPH to indicate antioxidant compounds extracted with dichloromethane, hexane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant...................................... 54 Bioautogram of crude extracts extracted with hexane, dichloromethane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant, separated with BEA, CEF, EMW, and sprayed with M. smegmatis.......... 58 Bioautogram of crude extracts extracted with hexane, dichloromethane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant, separated with BEA, CEF, EMW, and sprayed with M. smegmatis.......... 59 Bioautogram of crude extracts extracted with hexane, dichloromethane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant, separated with BEA, CEF, EMW, and sprayed with M. smegmatis........... 60 Bioautogram of crude extracts extracted with hexane, dichloromethane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant, separated with BEA, CEF, EMW, and sprayed with M. smegmatis........... 61 Bioautogram of crude extracts extracted with hexane, dichloromethane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant, separated with BEA, CEF, EMW, and sprayed with M. smegmatis........... 62 Bioautogram of crude extracts extracted with hexane, dichloromethane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant, separated with BEA, CEF, EMW, and sprayed with R. Erythropolis.......... 63 Bioautogram of crude extracts extracted with hexane, dichloromethane, acetone and methanol in lanes from left to right for each plant, separated with BEA, CEF, EMW, and sprayed with R. erythropolis.......... 64 Bioautogram of crude extracts extracted with hexane, dichloromethane, xiii
Page 1 and 2: SCREENING, ISOLATION AND PURIFICATI
Page 3 and 4: DEDICATION I dedicate this work to
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Declaration
Page 7 and 8: 1.7 Microbiology and pathogenicity
Page 9 and 10: 6.2.1 Preparation of 1000 ml Middle
Page 11: LIST OF FIGURES Page Fig. 1.1. The
Page 15 and 16: Fig. 3.27. Fig. 3.28. Fig. 3.29. Fi
Page 17 and 18: ABSTRACT The leaves of fifteen plan
Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER ONE 1.1 Introduction Plants
Page 21 and 22: and R. erythropolis ATCC 4277strain
Page 23 and 24: Current therapeutic applications of
Page 25 and 26: agricultural (pesticides and herbic
Page 27 and 28: Fig. 1.3. The chemical structure of
Page 29 and 30: national pharmacopoeias, published
Page 31 and 32: Snyder and Kirkland (1979) tested t
Page 33 and 34: African medicinal plants. In certai
Page 35 and 36: susceptibility is determined by the
Page 37 and 38: equal volume of sterile distilled w
Page 39 and 40: Fig. 1.6. Albizia gummifera (Lemmen
Page 41 and 42: Fig.1.9. Apodytes dimidiata (The Wo
Page 43 and 44: 1.6.7. Kirkia acuminata Kirkia acum
Page 45 and 46: Fig. 1.14. (A) Maytenus udanta and
Page 47 and 48: from East Coast Fever, and people t
Page 49 and 50: 1.7. Microbiology and pathogenicity
Page 51 and 52: indicates that essential oils can a
Page 53 and 54: Rhodococcus erythropolis is an aero
Page 55 and 56: 1.9. Aim and objectives 1.9.1. Aim
Page 57 and 58: each of the finely ground samples a
Page 59 and 60: phytochemical analysis (section 2.4
Page 61 and 62: The sub-fractions of 90:10 and 85:1
Page 63 and 64:
3.2. Phytochemical analysis of plan
Page 65 and 66:
BEA EMW CEF DCM HEX ACE MET DCM HEX
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
BEA EMW CEF Fig. 3.8. Chromatograms
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
3.4. Minimum inhibitory concentrati
Page 75 and 76:
Table 3.2.Average MIC (mg/ml) and t
Page 77 and 78:
BEA EMW CEF HEX DCM ACE MET HEX DCM
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
BEA EMW CEF Fig. 3.19. Bioautograms
Page 85 and 86:
BEA EMW CEF . Fig. 3.21. Bioautogra
Page 87 and 88:
Of the two solvent systems used fro
Page 89 and 90:
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11
Page 91 and 92:
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F1 F2
Page 93 and 94:
Fig. 3.28. TLC profile showing the
Page 95 and 96:
Fig. 3.30. TLC profile of fractions
Page 97 and 98:
Fig. 3.32. TLC profile of pooled su
Page 99 and 100:
Fig. 3.34. 1 H NMR spectra of compo
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Fig. 3.40. 13 C NMR spectra of comp
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
CHAPTER FOUR DISCUSSION Tuberculosi
Page 113 and 114:
e that active compounds may be in v
Page 115 and 116:
this plant. However, as can be seen
Page 117 and 118:
Britton, G. 1991, Methods in Plant
Page 119 and 120:
Eloff, J.N. 1999a. Which extractant
Page 121 and 122:
Harborne, J.B., and Williams, C.A.
Page 123 and 124:
Kemper, K.J. 1999. Longwood Herbal
Page 125 and 126:
Middleton, E., Chithan, K. 1993. Th
Page 127 and 128:
Pretorius, S.J., Joubert, P.H., Sco
Page 129 and 130:
Van der Geize R., and Dijkhuizen, L
Page 131 and 132:
CHAPTER SIX APPENDICES 6.1. Appendi
Page 133 and 134:
121 o C and 1 atm. For preparation
show all

Mmushi T MSc (Microbiology).pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?