- Page 1 and 2:
SCREENING, ISOLATION AND PURIFICATI
- Page 3 and 4:
DEDICATION I dedicate this work to
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Declaration
- Page 7 and 8:
1.7 Microbiology and pathogenicity
- Page 9 and 10:
6.2.1 Preparation of 1000 ml Middle
- Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURES Page Fig. 1.1. The
- Page 13 and 14:
Fig. 3.10. Fig. 3.11. Fig. 3.12. Fi
- Page 15 and 16:
Fig. 3.27. Fig. 3.28. Fig. 3.29. Fi
- Page 17 and 18:
ABSTRACT The leaves of fifteen plan
- Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER ONE 1.1 Introduction Plants
- Page 21 and 22:
and R. erythropolis ATCC 4277strain
- Page 23 and 24:
Current therapeutic applications of
- Page 25 and 26:
agricultural (pesticides and herbic
- Page 27 and 28:
Fig. 1.3. The chemical structure of
- Page 29 and 30:
national pharmacopoeias, published
- Page 31 and 32:
Snyder and Kirkland (1979) tested t
- Page 33 and 34:
African medicinal plants. In certai
- Page 35 and 36:
susceptibility is determined by the
- Page 37 and 38:
equal volume of sterile distilled w
- Page 39 and 40:
Fig. 1.6. Albizia gummifera (Lemmen
- Page 41 and 42:
Fig.1.9. Apodytes dimidiata (The Wo
- Page 43 and 44:
1.6.7. Kirkia acuminata Kirkia acum
- Page 45 and 46:
Fig. 1.14. (A) Maytenus udanta and
- Page 47 and 48:
from East Coast Fever, and people t
- Page 49 and 50:
1.7. Microbiology and pathogenicity
- Page 51 and 52:
indicates that essential oils can a
- Page 53 and 54:
Rhodococcus erythropolis is an aero
- Page 55 and 56:
1.9. Aim and objectives 1.9.1. Aim
- Page 57 and 58:
each of the finely ground samples a
- Page 59 and 60:
phytochemical analysis (section 2.4
- Page 61 and 62:
The sub-fractions of 90:10 and 85:1
- Page 63 and 64:
3.2. Phytochemical analysis of plan
- Page 65 and 66:
BEA EMW CEF DCM HEX ACE MET DCM HEX
- Page 67 and 68:
BEA EMW CEF DCM HEX ACE MET DCM HEX
- Page 69 and 70:
BEA EMW CEF Fig. 3.8. Chromatograms
- Page 71 and 72:
BEA EMW CEF DCM HEX ACE MET DCM HEX
- Page 73 and 74:
3.4. Minimum inhibitory concentrati
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 3.2.Average MIC (mg/ml) and t
- Page 77 and 78:
BEA EMW CEF HEX DCM ACE MET HEX DCM
- Page 79 and 80: BEA EMW CEF HEX DCM ACE MET HEX DCM
- Page 81 and 82: BEA EMW CEF HEX DCM ACE MET HEX DCM
- Page 83 and 84: BEA EMW CEF Fig. 3.19. Bioautograms
- Page 85 and 86: BEA EMW CEF . Fig. 3.21. Bioautogra
- Page 87 and 88: Of the two solvent systems used fro
- Page 89 and 90: F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11
- Page 91 and 92: F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F1 F2
- Page 93 and 94: Fig. 3.28. TLC profile showing the
- Page 95 and 96: Fig. 3.30. TLC profile of fractions
- Page 97 and 98: Fig. 3.32. TLC profile of pooled su
- Page 99 and 100: Fig. 3.34. 1 H NMR spectra of compo
- Page 101 and 102: Fig. 3.36. 1 H NMR spectra of compo
- Page 103 and 104: Fig. 3.38. 1 H NMR spectra of compo
- Page 105 and 106: Fig. 3.40. 13 C NMR spectra of comp
- Page 107 and 108: Fig. 3.42. 1 H NMR spectra of compo
- Page 109 and 110: Fig. 3.44. 1 H NMR spectra of compo
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER FOUR DISCUSSION Tuberculosi
- Page 113 and 114: e that active compounds may be in v
- Page 115 and 116: this plant. However, as can be seen
- Page 117 and 118: Britton, G. 1991, Methods in Plant
- Page 119 and 120: Eloff, J.N. 1999a. Which extractant
- Page 121 and 122: Harborne, J.B., and Williams, C.A.
- Page 123 and 124: Kemper, K.J. 1999. Longwood Herbal
- Page 125 and 126: Middleton, E., Chithan, K. 1993. Th
- Page 127 and 128: Pretorius, S.J., Joubert, P.H., Sco
- Page 129: Van der Geize R., and Dijkhuizen, L
- Page 133 and 134: 121 o C and 1 atm. For preparation