Download the report (150 p.) - KCE
Download the report (150 p.) - KCE
Download the report (150 p.) - KCE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
90 Making General Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Retention <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 90<br />
Belgium is no exception. Health professions, at different levels, have a strong role in<br />
developing policies : this can be seen through <strong>the</strong> numerous executive and consultative<br />
bodies (particularly within <strong>the</strong> Social insurance institution RIZIV/INAMI) in which<br />
medical representatives sit along with government bodies and are allowed to wield<br />
considerable influence on <strong>the</strong> policy process 194 : National Committee of Physicians and<br />
Sickness Funds, Committee for Medical Evaluation and Control, Planning Commission ,<br />
National Council for Hospital Facilities, etc. Belgium is clearly a country which provides<br />
many opportunities to interest groups to influence or block a policy. Although this<br />
could be sometimes considered as a hurdle to policy changes 195 , <strong>the</strong> Belgian situation is<br />
clearly that of pluralism. This situation makes stakeholder analysis an important tool for<br />
developing solutions in Belgium.<br />
This chapter aims at assessing <strong>the</strong> political power side of <strong>the</strong> problem and <strong>the</strong> political<br />
feasibility of policies for improving GPs’ attraction, recruitment and retention through a<br />
stakeholders’ analysis. Stakeholders are defined as “persons or groups that have<br />
interests in an issue, including those with some role in making a decision or its<br />
execution” 192 . A stakeholders’ analysis can be defined as “an approach, a tool or set of<br />
tools for generating knowledge about actors to understand <strong>the</strong>ir behavior, intentions,<br />
interrelations and interests; and for assessing <strong>the</strong> influence and resources <strong>the</strong>y bring to<br />
bear on decision-making” 196 . This stakeholders’ analysis will help to understand <strong>the</strong><br />
interests and influence of individuals or groups both within and outside <strong>the</strong> organization<br />
of general practice.<br />
6.2 OBJECTIVES<br />
This stakeholders analysis has four objectives:<br />
• To describe stakeholders’ understanding of <strong>the</strong> challenges faced by<br />
general practice in Belgium;<br />
• To identify <strong>the</strong> policy options more likely to be supported aiming at<br />
improving <strong>the</strong> GP’s career;<br />
• To identify <strong>the</strong> criteria and factors making <strong>the</strong> stakeholders more likely<br />
to support or oppose some policy options;<br />
• To identify implementation details of <strong>the</strong> policy options more likely to<br />
be supported.<br />
6.3 METHOD OF THE STAKEHOLDER SURVEY<br />
6.3.1 Design<br />
This survey used a multi-criteria analysis (MCM) 197 , a tool to support decision among<br />
different options and several criteria (see appendix 5.1.). It aims at combining<br />
comparability between interviewees while accommodating each respondent’s<br />
perspective. MCM has been used in <strong>the</strong> health sector for obesity prevention 198 or<br />
selection of anti-psychotic drugs 199 .<br />
Multi-criteria analysis has <strong>the</strong> following characteristics 197 :<br />
• To identify alternative ways to solve a problem (GPs’ attraction,<br />
retention and recruitment): policy options.<br />
• To suggest criteria allowing <strong>the</strong> appraisal of those policies: policy<br />
criteria.<br />
• To score each option on each criteria.<br />
• To weigh each criteria in order to reflect its relative importance.