28.12.2013 Views

Download the report (150 p.) - KCE

Download the report (150 p.) - KCE

Download the report (150 p.) - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 Making General Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Retention <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 90<br />

1.4.1.6 Inactivity in <strong>the</strong> curative sector for <strong>the</strong> licensed GPs: annual growth rates by<br />

linguistic community (INAMI/RIZIV database)<br />

The annual growth rate of inactivity was stratified by linguistic community (table 4<br />

below). Overall, <strong>the</strong> differences between <strong>the</strong> communities were small. However,<br />

among <strong>the</strong> youngest age group, <strong>the</strong> increase of inactivity was much more important in<br />

<strong>the</strong> French-speaking (annual growth rate of 8.5%) than in <strong>the</strong> Dutch-speaking part<br />

(1.1%). In <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r age groups, <strong>the</strong> growth rate was slightly more important for <strong>the</strong><br />

Dutch-speaking GPs compared to <strong>the</strong> French-speaking GPs but <strong>the</strong>se differences were<br />

not statistically significant, apart for <strong>the</strong> age group 40-49 and 60-69 (p-value=0.02).<br />

Yearly<br />

growth<br />

rate FR<br />

Table 4: Licensed GPs: annual growth rate of <strong>the</strong> inactivity in <strong>the</strong> curative<br />

sector under AMI by age group and linguistic community, 1995-2005.<br />

Source: INAMI/RIZIV database, Belgium, 2007<br />

Yearly<br />

growth rate<br />

NL<br />

p-value<br />

Difference<br />

north/south<br />

Age group<br />

95% CI<br />

95% CI<br />

25 – 29 0.085 (0.01, 0.16) * 0.011 (-0.03, 0.05) 0.04<br />

30 – 39 0.081 (0.06, 0.10) *** 0.093 (0.08, 0.11) *** 0.17<br />

40 – 49 0.117 (0.10, 0.13) *** 0.141 (0.12, 0.16) *** 0.02<br />

50 – 59 0.085 (0.06, 0.11) *** 0.096 (0.07, 0.12) *** 0.28<br />

60 – 69 0.013 (-0.01, 0.04) 0.051 (0.03, 0.08) *** 0.02<br />

Source: INAMI/RIZIV (file of profiles), 2007 a beta coefficient of <strong>the</strong> binomial regression:<br />

inactivity rate at time t = a + b year; ***significant at 0.001; ** at 0.01; * at 0.05;<br />

An analysis has been carried out In order to assess if <strong>the</strong> situation is different between<br />

GPs and <strong>the</strong> specialists, (see figures 5 and 6 and table 8 in appendix 1.9)<br />

1.4.2 CIPMP DATABASE: Inactivity 4 to 6 years AND 9 to 11 years after <strong>the</strong><br />

degree as Medical Doctor<br />

1.4.2.1 Inactivity in <strong>the</strong> curative sector for <strong>the</strong> non licensed and <strong>the</strong> licensed GPs:<br />

analysis per gender (CIPMP database)<br />

The total number of young qualified GPs (unlicensed or licensed) increased from 1988<br />

to 2001 (from 944 between 1998 and 1990 to 1137 between 1999 and 2001). However,<br />

<strong>the</strong> proportion being inactive in <strong>the</strong> curative sector 4 to 6 years after <strong>the</strong>ir degree as<br />

MD increased too (from 12.7% in 1994 to 19.2% in 2005) (table 5 below). Female GPs<br />

had higher inactivity proportions than male GPs throughout <strong>the</strong> period but <strong>the</strong><br />

proportion of men inactive in <strong>the</strong> curative sector nearly doubled during <strong>the</strong> same<br />

period.<br />

1.4.2.2 Inactivity in <strong>the</strong> curative sector for <strong>the</strong> specialists: analysis per gender (CIPMP<br />

database)<br />

Compared to <strong>the</strong> GPs, <strong>the</strong> inactivity in <strong>the</strong> curative sector among specialists was less<br />

important 4 to 6 years after <strong>the</strong>ir degree as specialists (from 1.36% in 1994 to 2.15% in<br />

2005) and much more stable during <strong>the</strong> observed years (table 5). The difference<br />

between genders for <strong>the</strong> specialists is slighter than among GPs (1 or 2% only).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!