Downtown Suffolk Revitalization Plan through Arts - College of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

28 cities around the country. The following are examples of varying parking requirements for bars: Ithaca, NY 1 space per 50 GLA Greensboro, NC 1 space per every 4 seats or 1 space per 50 GLA, whichever is greater, plus 2 per 3 employees Spartanburg, NC 1 space per 4 seats Des Moines, IA 1 space per 150 GLA The number of parking spaces varies greatly from city to city. Greensboro and Spartanburg require half the amount as Suffolk, while Ithaca requires three times as much as Des Moines. A survey of required parking can be completed for each use. The APA publication illustrates that many of the parking requirements in Suffolk can be reduced. It is recommended that a parking survey be conducted to assess the demand of parking, project new businesses and their required parking, and analyze the specific need for new parking. Several remedies to parking problems can be discussed at this point, however this plan cannot recommend a specific action without further study. One method of mitigating the supply of parking spaces can be achieved by reducing the size of the space. Nine feet in with is an acceptable size, however, it is possible to have spaces as low as eight feet. By reducing the size of the parking space, more spaces can be created. Another mitigation technique is through parking pricing, or adding parking meters. Currently many city lots and on street parking spaces offer free two hour parking. No parking meters exist Downtown. By adding parking meters, the city can regulate the amount of available parking through controlling the price. Prices are raised on meters until a certain percentage of parking is available at a certain time. For example, if all of the metered spaces are full at $1 for two hours, the price would be raised to $2 for two hours. If all of the spaces are still full at this price, it would be raised again until a certain percentage of the meters are open at any given time. Charging for parking is also a means for the city to increase revenue.
29 Ownership The following information in this section is reported from the City of Suffolk’s Assessors Office. The information is current as of February 2005. It should be noted that several modifications were made to this database information, specifically changes in spelling of owners names where multiple versions of the same owner were present. The ownership of land is divided between one hundred eighty-eight people, companies, or corporations. It should be noted that two parcels in the study area have unknown ownership. An important step in any local project is being able to work with the property owners to explore new options for development and marketing strategies. Having local owners and owners with parcels in close proximity to one another are also key elements of a successful revitalization plan. The largest owner in the study is the City of Suffolk with 45 parcels and 666,067 sq ft. The city owns 19% of the land in the study area. Four of the top ten landowners by total area are churches with the other owners being companies or corporations. Eight of the top owners are located in Suffolk, while two are nearby (SunTrust is located in Richmond while EDJOE is located in Norfolk). In total, the top 10 landowners hold 41% of the land in the study area. Table 12 and map 8 illustrates the top 10 landowners by total square feet. Table 12: Land Owners by total square feet owned Owner Sq Ft Parcels CITY OF SUFFOLK 666067 44 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 153724 9 CARTER & SONS FURNITURE CO INC 129738 9 SUFFOLK CHRISTIAN CHURCH 118432 1 MAIN STREET UNITED METH CHURCH 88913 3 ST PAUL EPISCOPAL CHURCH 78920 3 SHEFCO INC 49779 8 SUNTRUST BANK 46431 7 ALSHEF INC 45808 9 EDJOE LLC 44279 5
Page 1: Downtown Suffolk Revitalization Pla
Page 4 and 5: Table of Contents Executive Summary
Page 6 and 7: 6 take the community the same amoun
Page 8 and 9: Introduction Downtown Suffolk in so
Page 10 and 11: Demographics Total Population A dem
Page 12 and 13: Table 3 - Population by Age 12 Down
Page 14 and 15: significantly much lower then all o
Page 17 and 18: 17 Table 6 Percentage of zoning by
Page 19 and 20: 19 A second type of building use is
Page 22 and 23: 22 Building Conditions The conditio
Page 24 and 25: Examples of Building Deficiencies 2
Page 26 and 27: 26 Table 10 - Study Area Parking Pa
Page 30 and 31: 30 Another way to look at ownership
Page 33 and 34: Table 15: Owners with the highest a
Page 35 and 36: 35 The other category of signs are
Page 37 and 38: 37 Future Development In cooperatio
Page 39: 39 Retail Analysis Trade Area Downt
Page 42 and 43: 42 At 243 businesses, retail establ
Page 44 and 45: demand an Appliance store would exi
Page 46 and 47: 46 Arts Analysis Suffolk Center for
Page 48 and 49: 48 Barons Pub - Open for just over
Page 50 and 51: 50 Seaboard Station - After a major
Page 52 and 53: provide information on their websit
Page 55 and 56: Table 24 - Induced Spending at an A
Page 57 and 58: Table 27 - Musical Play participati
Page 59 and 60: 59 Assets and Liabilities Downtown
Page 61 and 62: 61 The Revitalization Plan Analyzin
Page 63 and 64: 63 Strategy 1.1.2 Once the Suffolk
Page 65 and 66: 65 Implementation: The Tourism Depa
Page 67 and 68: 67 Objective 1.6 Provide funding fo
Page 69 and 70: 69 lot along Commerce. Massing and
Page 71 and 72: Existing Conditions Proposed Develo
Page 73 and 74: parking needs assessment to be comp
Page 75 and 76: 75 Strategy 3.2.2: New design guide
Page 77 and 78: 77 Implementation: The Public Works
Page 79 and 80:
Goal 4 Downtown Suffolk is the hear
Page 81 and 82:
81 Strategy 4.4.2: New businesses w
Page 83 and 84:
Objective Strategy Agency Office 83
Page 85 and 86:
85 Objective Strategy Agency Start
Page 87:
Objective Strategy Agency Downtown
show all

Downtown Suffolk Revitalization Plan through Arts - College of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?