Ordinary Council Meeting - Hastings Council - NSW Government
Ordinary Council Meeting - Hastings Council - NSW Government
Ordinary Council Meeting - Hastings Council - NSW Government
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PORT MACQUARIE-HASTINGS COUNCIL<br />
appear to represent a significant departure from the design principles and strategies of the<br />
adopted Structure Plan.<br />
In the absence of any detailed justification or planning grounds to enable <strong>Council</strong> to make an<br />
informed assessment of the potential impacts on which to support the proposal, it is<br />
recommended that <strong>Council</strong> not amend the HOB and FSR LEP Maps as requested. Instead, it is<br />
suggested that Kmart be invited to meet with <strong>Council</strong> planning staff to discuss options for the<br />
potential future location of retail development on the land in the context of the adopted Structure<br />
Plan and recognising the constraints posed by the landowner’s commitment to retaining the<br />
Primary School on the western half of the site up to 2021.<br />
State <strong>Government</strong> submissions<br />
Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA)<br />
As a result of further consultation with the Authority during the public exhibition, the RTA has<br />
raised no objections to the proposal, provided that steps will be taken to adopt a Section 94<br />
Contributions Plan for roadworks as a matter of urgency and that the traffic model is validated<br />
to ensure the assumptions are sound.<br />
Comment:<br />
A Section 94 Plan for roadworks is currently being drafted. The ttm traffic modelling has been<br />
validated by <strong>Council</strong>'s traffic engineering staff who identified some initial amendments which<br />
have been since been made to <strong>Council</strong>'s satisfaction.<br />
Land and Property Management Authority (LPMA)<br />
The LPMA seek a minor amendment to the LES to incorporate text from <strong>Council</strong>'s Summary<br />
Information Sheet accompanying the exhibition material to clarify the relationship between the<br />
proposed building height limits, road movement networks and indicative block plan as<br />
referenced in the document.<br />
The submission notes that the orientation of the mid-block link between Warlters and Park<br />
Streets shown on figures 7, 8 and 16 of the LES is inconsistent. It is considered necessary that<br />
a critical review of this alignment be undertaken in light of <strong>Council</strong>'s January 2009 decision to<br />
allow consideration of a corresponding area on the adjoining EOI site to offset the provision of a<br />
600sqm foreshore plaza square as part of any future redevelopment of the Marina.<br />
Comment:<br />
Amendment to the LES for as requested is considered reasonable for clarity.<br />
With respect to the orientation of the mid-block link, the draft exhibited HOB and FSR Maps<br />
accord with the adopted Structure Plan. This matter will be a consideration in any future<br />
development of the Warlters Street site and Port Marina.<br />
Department of Climate Change and Water (DECCW)<br />
DECCW’s submission indicates support to the LES recommendations with respect to koala<br />
habitat and recommends that the immediate planting of additional trees and Vegetation<br />
Rehabilitation Plan also include a requirement that the number of trees specified to be planted<br />
actually reach maturity. The need to reclassify the remainder of the park from “operational” to<br />
“community” land following realignment of Bay Street is also flagged to ensure that the park and<br />
koala food resource remains available in the long-term.<br />
Comment:<br />
These matters will be specified in the future precinct-wide Development Control Plan.<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> Office of Water (NOW)<br />
No specific concerns or objections are raised.<br />
PAGE 75