Band 2 Anthropogenesis - H.P. Blavatsky

THE SEVEN SOULS OF THE EGYPTOLOGISTS.
If one turns to those wells of information, "The Natural Genesis" and the Lectures of Mr. Gerald Massey, the proofs of the
antiquity of the doctrine under analysis become positively overwhelming. That the belief of the author differs from ours
can hardly invalidate the facts. He views the symbol from a purely natural standpoint, one perhaps a trifle too
materialistic, because too much that of an ardent Evolutionist and follower of the modern Darwinian dogmas. Thus he
shows that "the student of Bohme's books finds much in them concerning these Seven Fountain Spirits and primary
powers, treated as seven properties of nature in the alchemistic and astrological phase of the mediaeval mysteries;"* and
adds --
"The followers of Bohme look on such matter as divine revelation of his inspired Seership. They know nothing of the
natural genesis, the history and persistence of the Wisdom** of the past (or of the broken links), and are unable to
recognise the physical features of the ancient Seven Spirits beneath their modern metaphysical or alchemist mask. A
second connecting link between the Theosophy of Bohme and the physical origins of Egyptian thought, is extant in the
fragments of Hermes Trismegistus.*** No matter whether these teachings are called Illuminatist, Buddhist, Kabalist,
Gnostic, Masonic, or Christian, the elemental types can only be truly known in their beginnings.**** When the prophets or
visionary showmen of cloudland come to us claiming original inspiration, and utter something new, we judge of its value
by what it is in itself. But if we find they bring us the ancient matter which they cannot account for, and we can, it is natural
that we should judge it by the primary significations rather than the latest pretensions.***** It is useless for us to read our
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------------------------------------
* The Natural Genesis, Vol. I.. pp, 318-319.
** Yet there are some, who may know something of these, even outside the author's lines, wide as they undeniably are.
*** This connecting link, like others, was pointed out by the present writer nine years before the appearance of the work
from which the above is quoted, namely in Isis Unveiled, a work full of such guiding links between ancient, mediaeval,
and modern thought, but, unfortunately, too loosely edited.
**** Ay; but how can the learned writer prove that these "beginnings" were precisely in Egypt, and nowhere else; and only
50,000 years ago?
***** Precisely: and this is just what the Theosophists do. They have never claimed," (original inspiration," not even as
mediums, but have always pointed, and do now point to the "primary signification" of the symbols, which they trace to
other [[Footnote continued on next page]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 631 THE SIDEREAL SEVEN.
later thought into the earliest types of expression, and then say the ancients meant that.* Subtilized interpretations which
have become doctrines and dogmas in theosophy have now to be tested by their genesis in physical phenomena, in
order that we may explode their false pretensions to supernatural origin or supernatural knowledge.**
But the able author of the "Book of the Beginnings" and of "The Natural Genesis" does -- very fortunately, for us -- quite
the reverse. He demonstrates most triumphantly our Esoteric (Buddhist) teachings, by showing them identical with those
of Egypt. Let the reader judge from his learned lecture on "The Seven Souls of Man."*** Says the author:--
"The first form of the mystical SEVEN was seen to be figured in heaven by the Seven large stars of the great Bear, the
constellation assigned by the Egyptians to the Mother of Time, and of the Seven Elemental Powers."
Just so, for the Hindus place in the great Bear their seven primitive Rishis and call this constellation the abode of the
Saptarishi, Riksha and Chitra-Sikhandinas. But whether it is only an astronomical myth or a primordial mystery, having a
deeper meaning than it bears on its surface, is what their adepts claim to know. We are also told that "the Egyptians
divided the face of the sky by night into seven parts. The primary Heaven was seven-fold." So it was with the Aryans. One
has but read the Puranas about the beginnings of Brahma, and his "Egg" to see it. Have the Aryans taken the idea from
the Egyptians? -- "The earliest forces," proceeds the lecturer, "recognized in nature were reckoned as seven in number.
These became seven elementals, devils (?) or later, divinities. Seven properties were assigned to nature, as
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------------------------------------
[[Footnote continued from previous page]] countries, older even than Egypt; significations, moreover, which emanate from
a hierarchy (or hierarchies, if preferred) of living wise men, mortals, notwithstanding that Wisdom, who reject every
approach to supernaturalism.
* But where is the proof that the ancients did not mean precisely that which the theosophists claim? Records exist for
what they say, just as other records exist for what Mr. G. Massey says. His interpretations are very correct, but equally
one-sided. Surely nature has more than one physical aspect; for astronomy, astrology, and so on, are all on the physical,
not the spiritual plane.
** It is to be feared that Mr. Massey has not succeeded. We have our followers as he has his followers, and materialistic
Science steps in and takes little account of both his and our speculations!
*** The fact that this learned Egyptologist does not recognise in the doctrine of the "Seven Souls," as he terms our
principles, or "metaphysical concepts," but "the primitive biology or physiology of the Soul," does not invalidate our
argument. The lecturer touches on only two keys, those that unlock the astronomical and the physiological mysteries of