Band 2 Anthropogenesis - H.P. Blavatsky

More documents

Recommendations

Info

* "A very strong argument in favour of variability is supplied by the science of Embryology. Is not a man in the uterus . . . . . a simple cell, a vegetable with three or four leaflets, a tadpole with branchiae, a mammal with a tail, lastly a primate (?) and a biped? It is scarcely possible not to recognise in the embryonic evolution a rapid sketch, a faithful summary, of the entire organic series." (Lefevre, Philosophy, p. 484). The summary alluded to is, however, only that of the store of types hoarded up in man, the microcosm. This simple explanation meets all such objections, as the presence of the rudimentary tail in the foetus -- a fact triumphantly paraded by Haeckel and Darwin as conclusively in favour of the Ape-Ancestor theory. It may also be pointed out that the presence of a vegetable with leaflets in the embryonic stages is not explained on ordinary evolutionist principles. Darwinists have not traced man through the vegetable, but Occultists have. Why then this feature in the embryo, and how do the former explain it? ** "The Proofs of Evolution," a lecture by Haeckel. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Vol. 2, Page]] 188 THE SECRET DOCTRINE. instant of its physical appearance as a germ to its ultimate formation and birth -- the Pythagorean esoteric doctrine of metempsychosis, so erroneously interpreted by critics. The meaning of the axiom: "A stone becomes a plant; a plant, a beast; a beast, a man, etc." was mentioned in another place in relation to the spiritual and physical evolution of men on this Earth. We will now add a few more words to make the matter clearer. What is the primitive shape of the future man? A grain, a corpuscle, say some physiologists; a molecule, an ovum of the ovum, say others. If it could be analysed -- by the microscope or otherwise -- of what ought we to expect to find it composed? Analogically, we should say, of a nucleus of inorganic matter, deposited from the circulation at the germinating point, and united with a deposit of organic matter. In other words, this infinitesimal nucleus of the future man is composed of the same elements as a stone -- of the same elements as the Earth, which the man is destined to inhabit. Moses is cited by the Kabalists as authority for the remark that it required earth and water to make a living being, and thus it may be said that man first appears as a stone. At the end of three or four weeks the ovum has assumed a plant-like appearance, one extremity having become spheroidal and the other tapering like a carrot. Upon dissection it is found to be composed, like an onion, of very delicate laminae or coats, enclosing a liquid. The laminae approach each other at the lower end, and the embryo hangs from the root of the umbilicus almost like the fruit from the bough. The stone has now become changed, by "metempsychosis," into a plant. Then the embryonic creature begins to shoot out, from the inside outward, its limbs, and develops its features. The eyes are visible as two black dots; the ears, nose, and mouth form depressions, like the points of a pineapple, before they begin to project. The embryo develops into an animal-like foetus -- the shape of a tadpole -- and, like an amphibious reptile, lives in water and develops from it. Its Monad has not yet become either human or immortal, for the Kabalists tell us that this only occurs at the "fourth hour." One by one the foetus assumes the characteristics of the human being, the first flutter of the immortal breath passes through its being; it moves; and the divine essence settles in the infant frame, which it will inhabit until the moment of physical death, when man becomes a spirit. This mysterious process of a nine-months' formation, the Kabalists call the completion of the "individual cycle of evolution." As the foetus develops amidst the liquor amnii in the womb, so the Earths germinate in the universal ether, or astral fluid, in the womb of the Universe. These cosmic children, like their pigmy inhabitants, are at first nuclei; then ovules; then gradually mature; and becoming ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Vol. 2, Page]] 189 NATURALISTS INVENTING LINKS. mothers, in their turn, develop mineral, vegetable, animal, and human forms. From centre to circumference, from the imperceptible vesicle to the uttermost conceivable bounds of the Kosmos, those glorious thinkers, the Occultists, trace cycle merging into cycle, containing and contained in an endless series. The embryo evolving in its pre-natal sphere, the individual in his family, the family in the state, the state in mankind, the Earth in our system, that system in its central universe, the universe in the Kosmos, and the Kosmos in the ONE CAUSE . . . thus runs their philosophy of evolution, differing as we see, from that of Haeckel:-- "All are but parts of one stupendous whole, Whose body Nature is, and (Parabrahm) the soul . . ." These are the proofs of Occultism, and they are rejected by Science. But how is the chasm between the mind of man and animal to be bridged in this case? How, if the anthropoid and Homo primigenius had, argumenti gratia, a common ancestor (in the way modern speculation puts it), did the two groups diverge so widely from one another as regards mental capacity? True, the Occultist may be told that in every case Occultism does what Science repeats; it gives a common ancestor to ape and man, since it makes the former issue from primeval man. Ay, but that "primeval man" was man only in external form. He was mindless and soulless at the time he begot, with a female animal monster, the forefather of a series of apes. This speculation -- if speculation it be -- is at least logical, and fills the chasm between the mind of man and animal. Thus it accounts for and explains the hitherto unaccountable and inexplicable. The fact that, in the present stage of evolution, Science is almost certain that no issue can follow from the union of man and animal, is considered and explained elsewhere. Now what is the fundamental difference between the accepted (or nearly so) conclusions, as enunciated in "The Pedigree of Man," viz., that man and ape have a common ancestor; and the teachings of Occultism, which deny this conclusion and accept the fact that all things and all living beings have originated from one common source? Materialistic science makes man evolve gradually to what he is now, and, starting from the first protoplasmic speck called Moneron (which we are told has, like the rest, "originated in the course of immeasurable ages from a few, or from one simple, spontaneously arising original form, that has obeyed one law of evolution"), pass through "unknown and unknowable" types up to the ape, and thence to the human being. Where the transitional shapes are discoverable we are not told; for the simple
eason that no "missing links" between man and the apes have ever yet been found, though this fact in no way prevents men like Haeckel from inventing them ad libitum. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Vol. 2, Page]] 190 THE SECRET DOCTRINE. Nor will they ever be met with; simply, again, because that link which unites man with his real ancestry is searched for on the objective plane and in the material world of forms, whereas it is safely hidden from the microscope and dissecting knife within the animal tabernacle of man himself. We repeat what we have said in Isis Unveiled:-- ". . . . . . . All things had their origin in spirit -- evolution having originally begun from above and proceeded downward, instead of the reverse, as taught in the Darwinian theory. In other words, there has been a gradual materialization of forms until a fixed ultimate of debasement is reached. This point is that at which the doctrine of modern evolution enters into the arena of speculative hypothesis. Arrived at this period we will find it easier to understand Haeckel's Anthropogeny, which traces the pedigree of man 'from its protoplasmic root, sodden in the mud of seas which existed before the oldest of the fossiliferous rocks were deposited,' according to Professor Huxley's exposition. We may believe the man (of the Third Round) evolved 'by gradual modification of an (astral) mammal of ape-like organization' still easier when we remember that (though in a more condensed and less elegant, but still as comprehensible, phraseology) the same theory was said by Berosus to have been taught many thousands of years before his time by the man-fish Oannes or Dagon, the semi-demon of Babylonia* (though on somewhat modified lines). "But what lies back of the Darwinian line of descent? So far as he is concerned nothing but 'unverifiable hypotheses.' For, as he puts it, he views all beings 'as the lineal descendants of some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Silurian system was deposited.'** He does not attempt to show us who these 'few beings' were. But it answers our purpose quite as well, for, in the admission of their existence at all, resort to the ancients for corroboration and elaboration of the idea receives the stamp of scientific approbation. . . . " Truly, as also said in our first work: "If we accept Darwin's theory of the development of species, we find that his startingpoint is placed in front of an open door. We are at liberty with him, to either remain within, or cross the threshold, beyond which lies the limitless and the incomprehensible, or rather the Unutterable. If our mortal language is inadequate to express what our spirit dimly foresees in the great 'Beyond' -- while on this earth -- it must realize it at some point in the timeless Eternity." But what lies "beyond" Haeckel's theory? Why Bathybius Haeckelii, and no more! A further answer is given in Part III. Addenda. [[Footnote(s)]] ------------------------------------------------- * Cory: "Ancient Fragments." ** "Origin of Species," pp. 448, 489, first edition. ------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Vol. 2, Page]] 191 THE CAUSE OF DEGENERATION. STANZA IX. THE FINAL EVOLUTION OF MAN. ------- §§ (33) The creators repent. (34) They atone for their neglect. (35) Men become endowed with minds. (36) The fourth race develops perfect speech. (37) Every androgynous unit is separated and becomes bisexual. --------------------- 33. SEEING WHICH (the sin committed with the animals), THE LHAS (the spirits, the "Sons of Wisdom") WHO HAD NOT BUILT MEN (who had refused to create), WEPT, SAYING:-- ------- 34. "THE AMANASA (the 'mindless') HAVE DEFILED OUR FUTURE ABODES (a). THIS IS KARMA. LET US DWELL IN THE OTHERS. LET US TEACH THEM BETTER, LEST WORSE SHOULD HAPPEN." THEY DID. . . . ------- 35. THEN ALL BECAME ENDOWED WITH MANAS (minds). THEY SAW THE SIN OF THE MINDLESS. But they had already separated before the ray of divine reason had enlightened the dark region of their hitherto slumbering minds, and had sinned. That is to say, they had committed evil unconsciously, by producing an effect which was unnatural. Yet, like the other six primitive brother or fellow races, even so this seventh, henceforth degenerated race, which will have to bide its time for its final development on account of the sin committed, -- even this race will find itself on the last day on one of the seven paths. For "the wise* guard the home of nature's order, they assume excellent forms in secret."** But we must see whether the "animals" tampered with, were of the same kind as those known to zoology. [[Footnote(s)]] -------------------------------------------------
Page 1 and 2:
THE SECRET DOCTRINE BY H. P. BLAVAT
Page 3 and 4:
Various Deluges ... 141 The Arkite
Page 5 and 6:
CONCLUSION ... 437 ------- BOOK II.
Page 7 and 8:
The Seven Sabbaths ... 747 "Revelat
Page 9 and 10:
* As it is now asserted that the Ch
Page 11 and 12:
upheaval of the continent, changed
Page 13 and 14:
Beauteous Daughter of the Ether, Pa
Page 15 and 16:
VI. 22. THEN THE SECOND EVOLVED THE
Page 17 and 18:
(b) This expression shows in plain
Page 19 and 20:
Wake. "This animal was the especial
Page 21 and 22:
first pp. of Book I) and fallen int
Page 23 and 24:
(c) Number Seven, the fundamental f
Page 25 and 26:
"Now light," explains the author, "
Page 27 and 28:
mysticism Adam was not a man but a
Page 29 and 30:
ate of the forbidden fruit. The for
Page 31 and 32:
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 51 WHAT THE EARTH-
Page 33 and 34:
-----------------------------------
Page 35 and 36:
Continuing to create, Brahma assume
Page 37 and 38:
evolution of life on Earth, there m
Page 39 and 40:
tribes and people are also represen
Page 41 and 42:
passage by Mr. Laing, which gives t
Page 43 and 44:
exact period of the lunar year and
Page 45 and 46: in its spiritual aspects and emanat
Page 47 and 48: What is Binah Understanding? But wh
Page 49 and 50: of termination required to express
Page 51 and 52: * Whence the subsequent assertions
Page 53 and 54: love the science, and where the god
Page 55 and 56: possess an intelligence of their ow
Page 57 and 58: [[Vol. 2, Page]] 107 BATH-KOL, DAUG
Page 59 and 60: correlatives and contraries inhabit
Page 61 and 62: (Omoroka) who presided over the mon
Page 63 and 64: The occult doctrine, anyhow, can be
Page 65 and 66: ** Schol. Eurip. "Orestes," 463, Di
Page 67 and 68: and Adam is the collective name for
Page 69 and 70: This is a very curious statement as
Page 71 and 72: dissociated matter in the critical
Page 73 and 74: Vaivasvata produces a daughter and
Page 75 and 76: [[Vol. 2, Page]] 144 THE SECRET DOC
Page 77 and 78: have declared that "Ila was primari
Page 79 and 80: In the same letter, "The Evolution
Page 81 and 82: As far as XIXth century thought is
Page 83 and 84: ------- §§ (24) The higher creato
Page 85 and 86: 3. The Third Root-Race, the "Two-fo
Page 87 and 88: generally) larger by one cubic inch
Page 89 and 90: Darwinism," p. 159.) Apart from suc
Page 91 and 92: who after refusing to "create proge
Page 93 and 94: * An allegorical reference to the "
Page 95: WHAT MAY BE THE OBJECTIONS TO THE F
Page 99 and 100: others, PROBABLY arose in the tropi
Page 101 and 102: the same conditions and by the same
Page 103 and 104: The above is suggestive. We will se
Page 105 and 106: ** "Science Occulte," p. 646. *** "
Page 107 and 108: originals, who were symbolized by s
Page 109 and 110: -----------------------------------
Page 111 and 112: ** Vide infra, "The Septenary," in
Page 113 and 114: In other words, they were the Lemur
Page 115 and 116: Panini (!); that the Hindus had all
Page 117 and 118: [[Vol. 2, Page]] 230 THE SECRET DOC
Page 119 and 120: **** The "dynasties of the kings" w
Page 121 and 122: to Hades (the cave of Initiation) t
Page 123 and 124: -----------------------------------
Page 125 and 126: To close this rather lengthy commen
Page 127 and 128: When reading of "the last transform
Page 129 and 130: Mankind -- MAN was on earth in this
Page 131 and 132: to distinguish them. Even at the ag
Page 133 and 134: As witnesses to the Lemurians but a
Page 135 and 136: traditions about Hermes (of whom Eg
Page 137 and 138: (a) Such were the first truly physi
Page 139 and 140: Happily for the human race the "Ele
Page 141 and 142: a physical nature and spiritual att
Page 143 and 144: This period is the one described in
Page 145 and 146: A few more occult teachings must no
Page 147 and 148:
a Spirit, or Deva; and the "Bird's
Page 149 and 150:
-----------------------------------
Page 151 and 152:
VI R. R. 6 1/2 VII ROOT RACE theref
Page 153 and 154:
-----------------------------------
Page 155 and 156:
evolve, and that our humanity is ju
Page 157 and 158:
Thus, if we are to believe esoteric
Page 159 and 160:
Here reference is also made to the
Page 161 and 162:
II. The several meanings of the wor
Page 163 and 164:
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 325 ATLANTIS -- OC
Page 165 and 166:
Which means again, that our globe i
Page 167 and 168:
-----------------------------------
Page 169 and 170:
When it is maintained that no large
Page 171 and 172:
De Mirville -- who seeks to justify
Page 173 and 174:
Snakes). The eminent scholar saw in
Page 175 and 176:
--------------------- 47. FEW (men)
Page 177 and 178:
eing regarded as a direct denunciat
Page 179 and 180:
-----------------------------------
Page 181 and 182:
It is the Kabiri who are credited w
Page 183 and 184:
"Now," says Panadoras, "it is befor
Page 185 and 186:
fourth book of Laws, says that, lon
Page 187 and 188:
through the pen of Biblical scholar
Page 189 and 190:
Rahu, mythologically is a Daitya --
Page 191 and 192:
Dragon of absolute Wisdom -- that W
Page 193 and 194:
Satan represents metaphysically sim
Page 195 and 196:
The Noachian Deluge, as described i
Page 197 and 198:
In the same tradition that wise pri
Page 199 and 200:
the abode of the wicked (the Atlant
Page 201 and 202:
Thus, we believe we know that, thou
Page 203 and 204:
islands beyond, which are not far f
Page 205 and 206:
"Supreme Deity" bears, in every anc
Page 207 and 208:
that she must travel eastward, afte
Page 209 and 210:
Brahminical and Buddhistic legends,
Page 211 and 212:
the physical brain may forget event
Page 213 and 214:
"The waters arose, and covered the
Page 215 and 216:
-----------------------------------
Page 217 and 218:
some still older records -- to whic
Page 219 and 220:
Thus let it be. No disbeliever who
Page 221 and 222:
ecause while the evolution of the F
Page 223 and 224:
is born from Asat, and ASAT is bego
Page 225 and 226:
less entitled to a hearing, or less
Page 227 and 228:
THE "HOLY OF HOLIES." ITS DEGRADATI
Page 229 and 230:
Now Eustathius declares that ([IO])
Page 231 and 232:
Measures," 159). Besides the same a
Page 233 and 234:
in his supposed monotheism over the
Page 235 and 236:
help half a dozen volumes full of s
Page 237 and 238:
This "pagan" view was accepted from
Page 239 and 240:
since man appeared on earth, and ma
Page 241 and 242:
Perchance, this is justified on tha
Page 243 and 244:
cherub . . . thou hast walked up an
Page 245 and 246:
In the exoteric works, however, the
Page 247 and 248:
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------
Page 249 and 250:
Whether Milton's grandiose descript
Page 251 and 252:
anthropomorphic deity, and adopt fr
Page 253 and 254:
Thus, esoteric philosophy shows tha
Page 255 and 256:
Melia, Decharme thinks, is the pers
Page 257 and 258:
"This process, such as it is minute
Page 259 and 260:
From all that has been said in this
Page 261 and 262:
symbolized by the strong, powerful
Page 263 and 264:
Nevertheless, one thing is patent:
Page 265 and 266:
as Cornutus*** shows, was sometimes
Page 267 and 268:
called Venus' Looking-Glass, becaus
Page 269 and 270:
* Nanda is the first Buddhist Sover
Page 271 and 272:
genuine philosophers and students o
Page 273 and 274:
Again, let the reader read the Hind
Page 275 and 276:
their FORTY AND NINE POWERS, and th
Page 277 and 278:
eluctantly admits that "they may me
Page 279 and 280:
Kapila, the great sage and philosop
Page 281 and 282:
But the true esoteric sense of the
Page 283 and 284:
god; and history will not recognize
Page 285 and 286:
mysteries of the unseen Universe an
Page 287 and 288:
WE must not close this Part on the
Page 289 and 290:
-----------------------------------
Page 291 and 292:
* The Adwaitee Vedantic philosophy
Page 293 and 294:
the Moon from the Earth; from the M
Page 295 and 296:
(the Sun) are made therein parallel
Page 297 and 298:
"Yes! . . . yes, I will rule and wa
Page 299 and 300:
Puranas, their mother, Diti -- the
Page 301 and 302:
[[Footnote continued from previous
Page 303 and 304:
When the Western Orientalists have
Page 305 and 306:
expressed than is the four-fold Bra
Page 307 and 308:
THE SEVEN SOULS OF THE EGYPTOLOGIST
Page 309 and 310:
Lower circle: Tzelem of Nephesch. N
Page 311 and 312:
** I propose to follow here the tex
Page 313 and 314:
------ ----------------------------
Page 315 and 316:
An attempt is made to show the abov
Page 317 and 318:
and moral murderers of future gener
Page 319 and 320:
We may derive some consolation for
Page 321 and 322:
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------
Page 323 and 324:
only in speaking thus demonstrate t
Page 325 and 326:
not known," it is familiar now. We
Page 327 and 328:
-----------------------------------
Page 329 and 330:
tidal wave of "science-adulation."
Page 331 and 332:
against the too sanguine expectatio
Page 333 and 334:
* Those who with Haeckel regard the
Page 335 and 336:
estiality of the primeval mindless
Page 337 and 338:
May we not be permitted to throw a
Page 339 and 340:
texture, so every living (so-called
Page 341 and 342:
But this is the limit beyond which
Page 343 and 344:
founder of modern philosophy; the p
Page 345 and 346:
Quaternary lasted 1,600,000 years (
Page 347 and 348:
[[Footnote continued from previous
Page 349 and 350:
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------
Page 351 and 352:
woolly rhinoceros), whom some over-
Page 353 and 354:
It is time the Occultists should di
Page 355 and 356:
portions should not be dredged from
Page 357 and 358:
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------
Page 359 and 360:
IS Science against those who mainta
Page 361 and 362:
*** This conjecture is but a half-g
Page 363 and 364:
in the arena, breaking a lance with
Page 365 and 366:
which is of still earlier date . .
Page 367 and 368:
neolithic flints in the Jordan vall
Page 369 and 370:
Strabo speaks of an island near to
Page 371 and 372:
There are those Orientalists and hi
Page 373 and 374:
shown to claim the same descent lik
Page 375 and 376:
So much so, that all ancient writin
Page 377 and 378:
Atlantis. So, also, the war between
Page 379 and 380:
True; but is not the phenomenon her
Page 381 and 382:
Touching on the problem in another
Page 383 and 384:
800 and 1,000 leagues, and that, ac
Page 385 and 386:
of the skin on both sides of the At
Page 387:
periods of history and tradition. B
show all

Band 2 Anthropogenesis - H.P. Blavatsky

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?