18.01.2014 Views

DESENVOLVIMENTO E CARACTERIZAÇÃO FÍSICO ... - UFSM

DESENVOLVIMENTO E CARACTERIZAÇÃO FÍSICO ... - UFSM

DESENVOLVIMENTO E CARACTERIZAÇÃO FÍSICO ... - UFSM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36<br />

was higher than in mango and pineapple wine 9,7 . The value for residual sugar shows that the<br />

fermentation was successful and classifies the wine as dry. Volatile acidity and pH attach to<br />

jelly pam wine durability based on Jackson 27 .<br />

Validation Parameters for major volatile compounds<br />

In general, the volatile compounds have shown a good linearity in the range of<br />

concentrations studied, as regression coefficients (R 2 ) varying between 0.991 (hexanoic acid)<br />

and 0.998 (propanol) (Table 2), with a linear range between 0.1 to 50 mg/l. The precision was<br />

studied as repeatability (n = 6 intra-day) and intermediate precision (n = 4 inter-days) and<br />

expressed as relative standard deviation (%RSD) in the model wine. Percent RSD values range<br />

from 6.5% (propanol) to 10.9% (hexanoic acid) were found for repeatability and between 7.2<br />

and 10.3% for intermediate precision. The LOD and LOQ were visually calculated from the<br />

ratio of the peak areas to the average noise and are given in Table 2.<br />

The results for limit of quantitation and detection were dependent on the<br />

physicochemical characteristics of the volatile compounds, in this sense, ethyl hexanoate and<br />

possessed the lowest detection limit (0.01 mg/l) among the studied compounds. The slope of<br />

the calibration line is also sowed in Table 2; according to Ferreira 28 the slope is a measure of<br />

method sensitivity and depends on both extraction efficiency and detector response for each<br />

compound. In this sense, ethyl hexanoate followed by isoamyl alcohol presented the higher<br />

sensitivity for the method; both compounds show a good response detector and also reached<br />

the highest percent of recovery. The recovery percentages obtained assigned to the method an<br />

acceptable accuracy at the three tested levels. The percentage recovery ranged between 86 and<br />

96% for hexanoic acid and isoamyl alcohol, respectively.<br />

Optimization of solid-phase microextraction conditions for minor volatile compounds<br />

Typically SPME headspace sampling was selected for this study. HS-SPME is an<br />

equilibrium technique that requires a previous optimization step of the sampling conditions, in<br />

order to obtain high recoveries of volatiles compounds and a good precision of the method 29,30 .<br />

The main parameters for optimizing an extraction system were evaluated for jelly palm wine,<br />

fiber adsorbent phase, salt addition and extraction temperature and time. The results of the<br />

optimization performed in this study (Table 3) shows that, among the three fibers evaluated,<br />

under the same conditions (35 °C for 45 min with 30% of salt, NaCl), the highest values for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!