Chapter 7 Rational Functions - College of the Redwoods
Chapter 7 Rational Functions - College of the Redwoods
Chapter 7 Rational Functions - College of the Redwoods
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Section 7.2 Reducing <strong>Rational</strong> <strong>Functions</strong> 621<br />
When it is difficult to ascertain <strong>the</strong> greatest common divisor, we’ll find it more<br />
efficient to proceed as follows:<br />
• Prime factor both numerator and denominator.<br />
• Cancel common factors.<br />
Thus, to reduce 12/18 to lowest terms, first express both numerator and denominator<br />
as a product <strong>of</strong> prime numbers, <strong>the</strong>n cancel common primes.<br />
12<br />
18 = 2 · 2 · 3<br />
2 · 3 · 3 = 2 · 2 · 3<br />
2 · 3 · 3 = 2 3<br />
When you cancel a 2, you’re actually dividing both numerator and denominator by 2.<br />
When you cancel a 3, you’re actually dividing both numerator and denominator by 3.<br />
Note that doing both (dividing by 2 and <strong>the</strong>n dividing by 3) is equivalent to dividing<br />
both numerator and denominator by 6.<br />
We will favor this latter technique, precisely because it is identical to <strong>the</strong> technique<br />
we will use to reduce rational functions to lowest terms. However, this “cancellation”<br />
technique has some pitfalls, so let’s take a moment to discuss some common cancellation<br />
mistakes.<br />
Cancellation<br />
You can spark some pretty heated debate amongst ma<strong>the</strong>matics educators by innocently<br />
mentioning <strong>the</strong> word “cancellation.” There seem to be two diametrically opposed camps,<br />
those who don’t mind when <strong>the</strong>ir students use <strong>the</strong> technique <strong>of</strong> cancellation, and on<br />
<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side, those that refuse to even use <strong>the</strong> term “cancellation” in <strong>the</strong>ir classes.<br />
Both sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> argument have merit. As we showed in equation (8), we can<br />
reduce 12/18 quite efficiently by simply canceling common factors. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand,<br />
instructors from <strong>the</strong> second camp prefer to use <strong>the</strong> phrase “factor out a 1” instead <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> phrase “cancel,” encouraging <strong>the</strong>ir students to reduce 12/18 as follows.<br />
12<br />
18 = 2 · 2 · 3<br />
2 · 3 · 3 = 2 3 · 2 · 3<br />
2 · 3 = 2 3 · 1 = 2 3<br />
This is a perfectly valid technique and one that, quite honestly, avoids <strong>the</strong> quicksand<br />
<strong>of</strong> “cancellation mistakes.” Instructors who grow weary <strong>of</strong> watching <strong>the</strong>ir students<br />
“cancel” when <strong>the</strong>y shouldn’t are quite likely to promote this latter technique.<br />
However, if we can help our students avoid “cancellation mistakes,” we prefer to<br />
allow our students to cancel common factors (as we did in equation (8)) when reducing<br />
fractions such as 12/18 to lowest terms. So, with <strong>the</strong>se thoughts in mind, let’s discuss<br />
some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most common cancellation mistakes.<br />
Let’s begin with a most important piece <strong>of</strong> advice.<br />
How to Avoid Cancellation Mistakes. You may only cancel factors, not<br />
addends. To avoid cancellation mistakes, factor completely before you begin to<br />
cancel.<br />
(8)<br />
Version: Fall 2007