Neil D. Burgess, Paul Harrison, Peter Sumbi, James Laizer, Adam ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ANNEXES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORESTS 2011 Forest Reserve Landscape Total Rank Kwamgumi Forest Reserve Other 26 127 Kwani-Tongwe Forest Reserve Other 26 128 Masanganya Forest Reserve Other 26 129 Uzigua Forest Reserve Other 26 130 Pindiro Forest Reserve Kilwa 25 131 Muhoro River Matumbi 24 132 Mtama Local Authority Forest Reserve Lindi 23 133 Mchungu Forest Reserve Matumbi 23 134 Kirengoma Forest Reserve Matumbi 22 135 Kolokole Forest Reserve Other 20 136 Vikindu Forest Reserve Other 20 137 Ruawa Forest Reserve Lindi 19 138 Amboni Caves Historical Site Other 18 139 Genda Genda Forest Reserve Other 15 140 Kwa Marimba Forest Reserve Other 14 141 Ruhoi Forest Reserve Matumbi 14 142 Kambai Forest Reserve Other 12 143 Manga Forest Reserve Other 12 144 Kisiju Forest Reserve Other 11 145 Nyambawala B Village Land Forest Reserve (proposed) Matumbi 3 146 90
ANNEXES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORESTS 2011 Table 29: METT Scores by Landscape and Category Category Kilwa Landscape Average Score Others Average Score Lindi Landscape Average Score Matumbi Landscape Average Score Zanzibar Landscape Average Score Max Score Kilwa Landscape % Score Others % Score Lindi Landscape % Score Matumbi Landscap e % Score Zanzibar Landscape % Score Ordinal Scores Percentage Scores 91 TOTALS 51.38 48.58 30.91 39.46 51.00 102.00 50% 48% 30% 39% 50% 1 Does the protected area have legal status 2.65 2.67 2.88 2.20 2.83 3 88% 89% 96% 73% 94% 2 Are there good regulations to control landuse & activities 2.12 2.25 1.69 1.44 2.17 3 71% 75% 56% 48% 72% 3 Can managing staff sufficiently enforce protected area rules 1.06 1.33 0.84 0.50 1.83 3 35% 44% 28% 17% 61% 4 Is management undertaken as per agreed objectives 2.21 1.75 1.44 1.78 2.00 3 74% 58% 48% 59% 67% 5 Is the PA design optimal for species & ecosystem function 2.65 2.29 2.06 1.88 2.33 3 88% 76% 69% 63% 78% 6 Is the PA boundary known & demarcated 2.26 2.71 2.13 1.68 2.00 3 75% 90% 71% 56% 67% 7 Is there a management plan & is it being implemented 0.97 2.29 0.91 0.72 1.33 3 32% 76% 30% 24% 44% 7a Planning process allows adequate stakeholder participation 1.00 0.63 0.31 0.72 1.00 1 100% 63% 31% 72% 100%
Page 1 and 2:
SYNTHESIS OF BASELINE INFORMATION O
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTION: TANZANIA’S COASTAL
Page 17 and 18:
BIODIVERSITY BASELINE: TANZANIA’S
Page 19 and 20:
Genus Species Synonyms Red List sta
Page 21 and 22:
East Usambara Kilulu Hills Amboni C
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
SPATIAL PLANNING BASELINE: TANZANIA
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56: SPATIAL PLANNING BASELINE: TANZANIA
Page 65 and 66: MANAGEMENT ISSUES: TANZANIA’S COA
Page 73 and 74: Vikindu Pande Pugu Ruvu Kisiju Much
Page 79 and 80: METT scores (total out of 100) MANA
Page 91 and 92: FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY: TANZANIA
Page 93 and 94: SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE: TANZANIA
Page 95 and 96: SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE: TANZANIA
Page 97 and 98: REFERENCES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FO
Page 103 and 104: ANNEXES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORES
Page 105: ANNEXES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORES
Page 113 and 114: KILWA LINDI MATUMBI ZANZIBAR Red Li
Page 125 and 126: KILWA LINDI MATUMBI ZANZIBAR Notes
Page 127 and 128: KILWA LINDI MATUMBI ZANZIBAR Notes
Page 133 and 134: KILWA LINDI MATUMBI ZANZIBAR ENDEMI
Page 157 and 158:
ANNEXES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORES
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
show all

Neil D. Burgess, Paul Harrison, Peter Sumbi, James Laizer, Adam ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?