20.04.2014 Views

Neil D. Burgess, Paul Harrison, Peter Sumbi, James Laizer, Adam ...

Neil D. Burgess, Paul Harrison, Peter Sumbi, James Laizer, Adam ...

Neil D. Burgess, Paul Harrison, Peter Sumbi, James Laizer, Adam ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MANAGEMENT ISSUES: TANZANIA’S COASTAL FORESTS 2011<br />

5 Financial Sustainability<br />

5.1 Overview<br />

The funding available for the management of the Coastal Forests in Tanzania is woefully inadequate.<br />

There is a zero allocation from the central government for the management of the national Forest<br />

Reserves in southern Tanzania, and the Forest Reserves are seen as an income generating resource by<br />

the District Councils. As an example, natural resources contribute the majority of the revenue available<br />

to the Rufiji District Council. It has been estimated from available data compiled from around the<br />

world, that adequate management of reserves similar to those of the eastern African coastal forests can<br />

be achieved if managers have around US$1,500-US$1,750 for each sq km of forest under their<br />

management (Love and Morrison 2007). Hence, there is an urgent need for a source of sustainable<br />

funding that can be used to assist protect and manage the reserves in the coastal regions of Tanzania.<br />

There are several stakeholder/actors that are investing money for forest activities in coastal areas and<br />

most of these actors have been conducting their activities in the Tanzania mainland than in the Island.<br />

Funding contributions from Central and Local Governments for forest conservation and management<br />

activities are limited and mostly in-kind. The collected revenue from forest products and services are not<br />

directly retained for forest conservation and management activities in the case study coastal districts.<br />

Non-existent or inadequate follow up of implementation of legal regulatory frameworks (bylaws,<br />

financial regulations) is common; the use of business planning tool for cost effective management and<br />

the use of tools for revenue collection in the selected coastal districts is low. This results in more<br />

encroachment to forest resources, inadequate information about forest conservation activities<br />

expenditures and revenue losses.<br />

There are possible potential projects that can be used as source of revenue for the forest activities in the<br />

coastal areas. These sources can be in different broad categories such as commercial / market driven<br />

funding approaches; community level approaches; project based approaches and emerging<br />

opportunities such as REDD. As efforts to explore different sources of income are still being worked out,<br />

it has to be noted that these coastal areas are characterized by community with low level of education,<br />

and limited sources of income generation activities. Moreover, the communities much depend on<br />

forests and forest related products and services. These necessitate the need for sustainable forest<br />

management in these coastal areas.<br />

5.2 Financing Forest in Coastal Districts and the Financial Status<br />

Financing forest conservation in the coastal districts (Rufiji, Kilwa, Lindi, Unguja and Pemba) comes from<br />

various different sources (Table 24).<br />

Table 24: Different Actors Working in the Selected Case Study Areas<br />

Actor Rufiji Kilwa Lindi Unguja Pemba<br />

Central government – Through respective ministries v v v v v<br />

Local government-District Council v v v v v<br />

WWF Tanzania Country Office v v v v v<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!